Sasja A Schepers1,2, Lotte Haverman3, Sima Zadeh4, Martha A Grootenhuis3,5, Lori Wiener4. 1. Division of Pediatrics, Psychosocial Department, Academic Medical Centre/Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. s.a.schepers@amc.nl. 2. Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands. s.a.schepers@amc.nl. 3. Division of Pediatrics, Psychosocial Department, Academic Medical Centre/Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Behavioral Health Core, Pediatric Psychosocial Support and Research Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice has been shown to enhance detection of health-related quality of life problems and satisfaction with care in children with cancer. This study seeks to identify which PRO information healthcare professionals (HCPs) find useful and what the perceived barriers for routinely assessing PROs are. PROCEDURE: A total of 352 pediatric HCPs (43% male) from 52 countries completed a semistructured online 28-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics (percentages) were used to identify highly important PRO information and perceived barriers. HCPs' perceived barriers were compared according to gender, years of work experience, and country using a Fishers exact test. RESULTS: The five highest ranked PRO topics relevant in routine assessment by HCPs were as follows: pain (98%), feeling sad or depressed (96%), overall physical symptoms (95%), problems with therapy adherence (94%), and overall emotional issues (93%). Five lowest ranked topics were as follows: difficulties praying (50%), other spiritual concerns (55, 56, and 60%), and feeling bored (60%). Barriers for assessing PROs included: time (58%), insufficient staff (49%), logistics (32%), and financial resources (26%). Providers from developing countries more often reported barriers concerning insufficient staff, logistics, and financial resources. CONCLUSIONS: HCPs strongly value the use of physical and psychosocial PROs within pediatric oncology practice, but mainly perceive organizational barriers for routine assessment. To successfully integrate PROs, efforts should be made to address HCP-perceived barriers, such that patient-reported problems can be detected and timely referrals made.
BACKGROUND: Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice has been shown to enhance detection of health-related quality of life problems and satisfaction with care in children with cancer. This study seeks to identify which PRO information healthcare professionals (HCPs) find useful and what the perceived barriers for routinely assessing PROs are. PROCEDURE: A total of 352 pediatric HCPs (43% male) from 52 countries completed a semistructured online 28-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics (percentages) were used to identify highly important PRO information and perceived barriers. HCPs' perceived barriers were compared according to gender, years of work experience, and country using a Fishers exact test. RESULTS: The five highest ranked PRO topics relevant in routine assessment by HCPs were as follows: pain (98%), feeling sad or depressed (96%), overall physical symptoms (95%), problems with therapy adherence (94%), and overall emotional issues (93%). Five lowest ranked topics were as follows: difficulties praying (50%), other spiritual concerns (55, 56, and 60%), and feeling bored (60%). Barriers for assessing PROs included: time (58%), insufficient staff (49%), logistics (32%), and financial resources (26%). Providers from developing countries more often reported barriers concerning insufficient staff, logistics, and financial resources. CONCLUSIONS: HCPs strongly value the use of physical and psychosocial PROs within pediatric oncology practice, but mainly perceive organizational barriers for routine assessment. To successfully integrate PROs, efforts should be made to address HCP-perceived barriers, such that patient-reported problems can be detected and timely referrals made.
Authors: Resiti T Mangunkusumo; Joop S Duisterhout; Nijs de Graaff; Erik J Maarsingh; Harry J de Koning; Hein Raat Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.118
Authors: Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Elizabeth D Cox; Sarah K Dobrozsi; Christopher B Forrest; Wendy E Gerhardt; Harald Kliems; Bryce B Reeve; Nan E Rothrock; Jin-Shei Lai; Jacob M Svenson; Lindsay A Thompson; Thuy Dan N Tran; Carole A Tucker Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Haneen Shalabi; Juliane Gust; Agne Taraseviciute; Pamela L Wolters; Allison B Leahy; Carlos Sandi; Theodore W Laetsch; Lori Wiener; Rebecca A Gardner; Veronique Nussenblatt; Joshua A Hill; Kevin J Curran; Timothy S Olson; Colleen Annesley; Hao-Wei Wang; Javed Khan; Marcelo C Pasquini; Christine N Duncan; Stephan A Grupp; Michael A Pulsipher; Nirali N Shah Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Allison Barz Leahy; Lisa A Schwartz; Yimei Li; Bryce B Reeve; Justin E Bekelman; Richard Aplenc; Ethan M Basch Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: S A Schepers; H A van Oers; H Maurice-Stam; J Huisman; C M Verhaak; M A Grootenhuis; L Haverman Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.186