Literature DB >> 17623263

Chemotherapy-induced normalization of FDG uptake by colorectal liver metastases does not usually indicate complete pathologic response.

Marcus C B Tan1, David C Linehan, William G Hawkins, Barry A Siegel, Steven M Strasberg.   

Abstract

Dramatic responses are being observed in colorectal cancer liver metastases treated with newer chemotherapeutic regimens. These have been associated with normalization of [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake (complete metabolic response) on follow-up Positron Emission Tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) scans in some patients. It is unclear how often complete metabolic response is indicative of complete tumor destruction. We analyzed a subset of patients who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma. Inclusion criteria were: (1) FDG-avid hepatic lesions before initiation of chemotherapy; (2) complete metabolic response of the same lesions after chemotherapy; and (3) histopathologic examination of hepatic lesions. Complete pathologic response was defined as no histologically identifiable viable tumor. Fourteen patients fit the inclusion criteria. All had synchronous, hepatic-only colorectal metastases. On microscopic examination, complete pathologic response to the neoadjuvant regimen was found in only 5 of 34 lesions (15%) and in only 3 of the 14 patients (21%). Seven lesions had complete metabolic response and disappeared on computed tomography (CT); of these, six still contained viable tumor. We conclude that complete metabolic response on FDG-PET after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an unreliable indicator of complete pathologic response. Therefore, currently, curative resection of liver metastases in these patients should not be deferred on the basis of FDG-PET findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17623263     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0218-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  31 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; John M Hoffman; Bruce Johnson; Howard I Scher; Barry A Siegel; Edward Y Cheng; Bruce D Cheson; Joyce O'shaughnessy; Kathryn Z Guyton; David A Mankoff; Lalitha Shankar; Steven M Larson; Caroline C Sigman; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Complete response of colorectal liver metastases after chemotherapy: does it mean cure?

Authors:  Stéphane Benoist; Antoine Brouquet; Christophe Penna; Catherine Julié; Mostafa El Hajjam; Sophie Chagnon; Emmanuel Mitry; Philippe Rougier; Bernard Nordlinger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Harry Agress; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Emile F I Comans; Milan E J Pijl; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  18F-FDG PET evaluation of the response to therapy for lymphoma and for breast, lung, and colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  PET in the assessment of therapy response in patients with carcinoma of the head and neck and of the esophagus.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Factors influencing the natural history of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  R Stangl; A Altendorf-Hofmann; R M Charnley; J Scheele
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-06-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Sequential preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography assessment of response to preoperative chemoradiation: a means for determining longterm outcomes of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jose G Guillem; Harvey G Moore; Timothy Akhurst; David S Klimstra; Leyo Ruo; Madhu Mazumdar; Bruce D Minsky; Leonard Saltz; W Douglas Wong; Steven Larson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  "Vanishing liver metastases"-A real challenge for liver surgeons.

Authors:  Alex Zendel; Eylon Lahat; Yael Dreznik; Barak Bar Zakai; Rony Eshkenazy; Arie Ariche
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Use of computed tomography in the management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cher Heng Tan; Revathy Iyer
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

3.  How to operate a liver tumor you cannot see.

Authors:  Karl J Oldhafer; Gregor A Stavrou; Guido Prause; Heinz-Otto Peitgen; Tim C Lueth; Stefan Weber
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Curable metastatic colorectal cancer: recommended paradigms.

Authors:  Richard N Berri; Eddie K Abdalla
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Evaluation of recurrent disease in the re-staging of colorectal cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT: Use of CEA and CA 19-9 in patient selection.

Authors:  Agostino Chiaravalloti; Alessandro Fiorentini; Erika Palombo; Davide Rinino; Annamaria Lacanfora; Roberta Danieli; Carmen Di Russo; Daniele Di Biagio; Ettore Squillaci; Orazio Schillaci
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  The effects of cancer chemotherapy on liver imaging.

Authors:  Philip J A Robinson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  PET scans as a predictive marker of survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Minsig Choi; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 8.  Tumour response evaluation with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: research technique or clinical tool?

Authors:  H Anderson; N Singh; K Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  Evaluation of cancer treatment in the abdomen: Trends and advances.

Authors:  Silanath Peungjesada; Hubert H Chuang; Srinivasa R Prasad; Haesun Choi; Evelyne M Loyer; Yulia Bronstein
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

10.  The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus.

Authors:  René Adam; Aimery De Gramont; Joan Figueras; Ashley Guthrie; Norihiro Kokudo; Francis Kunstlinger; Evelyne Loyer; Graeme Poston; Philippe Rougier; Laura Rubbia-Brandt; Alberto Sobrero; Josep Tabernero; Catherine Teh; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.