BACKGROUND: The reported learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is 20-100 cases. Our aim was to investigate whether advanced laparoscopic skills could decrease the learning curve for LRYGB with regard to major morbidity. METHODS: The senior author performed all operations in this series. His training included a laparoscopic fellowship without bariatric surgery, six years in surgical practice focusing on upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery, two courses on bariatric surgery at national meetings, one week of observing a bariatric program, and two mentored LRGBY cases. A comprehensive obesity program was put in place before the program began. Data were collected prospectively and reviewed at the series' end. Results are presented as mean +/- standard deviation and standard statistical analysis was applied. RESULTS: Between December 2003 and February 2005, 107 LRYGB operations were performed. Mean operative time decreased significantly with experience (p < 0.0001) and was 154 +/- 29, 132 +/- 40, 127 +/- 29, and 114 +/- 30 min by quartile. Mean length of stay was 2.9 +/- 1.6 days. Mean excess weight loss was 45.3% (n = 41) at six months. There were no conversions to an open procedure, no anastomotic leaks, no pulmonary embolisms, and no bowel obstructions. The five major complications (3 in the first 50 and 2 in the last 57 cases, p = NS) were two cases of biliopancreatic limb obstruction, two cases of significant gastrointestinal bleeding from anastomotic ulcer, and one case of gastric volvulus of the remnant stomach. CONCLUSIONS: A bariatric fellowship and/or extended mentoring are not required to safely initiate a bariatric program for surgeons with advanced laparoscopic skills. Operative time decreases significantly with experience, but morbidity and mortality remain low even early in the learning curve. A comprehensive obesity program seems necessary for success.
BACKGROUND: The reported learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is 20-100 cases. Our aim was to investigate whether advanced laparoscopic skills could decrease the learning curve for LRYGB with regard to major morbidity. METHODS: The senior author performed all operations in this series. His training included a laparoscopic fellowship without bariatric surgery, six years in surgical practice focusing on upper abdominal laparoscopic surgery, two courses on bariatric surgery at national meetings, one week of observing a bariatric program, and two mentored LRGBY cases. A comprehensive obesity program was put in place before the program began. Data were collected prospectively and reviewed at the series' end. Results are presented as mean +/- standard deviation and standard statistical analysis was applied. RESULTS: Between December 2003 and February 2005, 107 LRYGB operations were performed. Mean operative time decreased significantly with experience (p < 0.0001) and was 154 +/- 29, 132 +/- 40, 127 +/- 29, and 114 +/- 30 min by quartile. Mean length of stay was 2.9 +/- 1.6 days. Mean excess weight loss was 45.3% (n = 41) at six months. There were no conversions to an open procedure, no anastomotic leaks, no pulmonary embolisms, and no bowel obstructions. The five major complications (3 in the first 50 and 2 in the last 57 cases, p = NS) were two cases of biliopancreatic limb obstruction, two cases of significant gastrointestinal bleeding from anastomotic ulcer, and one case of gastric volvulus of the remnant stomach. CONCLUSIONS: A bariatric fellowship and/or extended mentoring are not required to safely initiate a bariatric program for surgeons with advanced laparoscopic skills. Operative time decreases significantly with experience, but morbidity and mortality remain low even early in the learning curve. A comprehensive obesity program seems necessary for success.
Authors: Garth H Ballantyne; Douglas Ewing; Rafael F Capella; Joseph F Capella; Dan Davis; Hans J Schmidt; Annette Wasielewski; Richard J Davies Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Alexandra Dresel; Joseph A Kuhn; Matthew V Westmoreland; Loraye J Talaasen; Todd M McCarty Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: P K Papasavas; F D Hayetian; P F Caushaj; R J Landreneau; J Maurer; R J Keenan; R F Quinlin; D J Gagné Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2002-09-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: F S Wehrtmann; J R de la Garza; K F Kowalewski; M W Schmidt; K Müller; C Tapking; P Probst; M K Diener; L Fischer; B P Müller-Stich; F Nickel Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Noëlle Geubbels; L Maurits de Brauw; Yair I Z Acherman; Arnold W J M van de Laar; Michel W J M Wouters; Sjoerd C Bruin Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Torgeir T Søvik; Erlend T Aasheim; Jon Kristinsson; Carl Fredrik Schou; Lien My Diep; Arild Nesbakken; Tom Mala Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Iran dos Santos Moraes; Carlos Augusto Scussel Madalosso; Luis Amauri Palma; Adriana Cristina da Silva Fornari; Maria do Socorro Dourado; Tiago Scherer; Richard Ricachenevsky Gurski; Fernando Fornari Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Stefan Wolter; Anna Duprée; Alexander ElGammal; Norbert Runkel; Johannes Heimbucher; Jakob R Izbicki; Oliver Mann; Philipp Busch Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.129