BACKGROUND: Improvement of dyslipidemia is an important benefit of bariatric surgery. The benefits of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) among dyslipidemia are still a matter of debate. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study between 2010 and 2013. Obese patients undergoing LSG, with recorded dyslipidemia at admission and a follow-up for at least 1 year, were included for analysis. Demographic characteristics, medication in use, and a complete lipid profile were collected before surgery. After surgery, weight was controlled at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Lipid profile was re-evaluated 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided according to weight loss into two groups: (A) adequate weight loss and (B) inadequate weight loss. Lipid profile evolution was then compared between groups. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Pre-op mean BMI was 45.13 ± 7.5 kg/m2. One year after LSG, mean BMI was 30.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2 with a change in BMI of 11.5 ± 6.6 kg/m2, a %TWL of 26.9 ± 13.5%, and a %EWL of 60.3 ± 36.6%. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia remission was achieved in 45 and 86% of the patients and improved in another 19 and 4% respectively. Seventy-four percent improved HDL levels. LDL levels improved in 39% and remitted in 37%. Medication was discontinued in 43.7%. HDL increase and LDL, TG, and non-HDL-C decrease were significantly greater in group A. CONCLUSIONS: LSG produces an improvement in lipid profile, with a significant increase in HDL and a decrease in LDL, triglycerides, and non-HDL-C.
BACKGROUND: Improvement of dyslipidemia is an important benefit of bariatric surgery. The benefits of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) among dyslipidemia are still a matter of debate. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study between 2010 and 2013. Obesepatients undergoing LSG, with recorded dyslipidemia at admission and a follow-up for at least 1 year, were included for analysis. Demographic characteristics, medication in use, and a complete lipid profile were collected before surgery. After surgery, weight was controlled at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Lipid profile was re-evaluated 1 year after surgery. Patients were divided according to weight loss into two groups: (A) adequate weight loss and (B) inadequate weight loss. Lipid profile evolution was then compared between groups. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Pre-op mean BMI was 45.13 ± 7.5 kg/m2. One year after LSG, mean BMI was 30.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2 with a change in BMI of 11.5 ± 6.6 kg/m2, a %TWL of 26.9 ± 13.5%, and a %EWL of 60.3 ± 36.6%. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia remission was achieved in 45 and 86% of the patients and improved in another 19 and 4% respectively. Seventy-four percent improved HDL levels. LDL levels improved in 39% and remitted in 37%. Medication was discontinued in 43.7%. HDL increase and LDL, TG, and non-HDL-C decrease were significantly greater in group A. CONCLUSIONS: LSG produces an improvement in lipid profile, with a significant increase in HDL and a decrease in LDL, triglycerides, and non-HDL-C.
Authors: Harold Bays; Shanu N Kothari; Dan E Azagury; John M Morton; Ninh T Nguyen; Peter H Jones; Terry A Jacobson; David E Cohen; Carl Orringer; Eric C Westman; Deborah B Horn; Wendy Scinta; Craig Primack Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Terry A Jacobson; Matthew K Ito; Kevin C Maki; Carl E Orringer; Harold E Bays; Peter H Jones; James M McKenney; Scott M Grundy; Edward A Gill; Robert A Wild; Don P Wilson; W Virgil Brown Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: D Benaiges; J A Flores-Le-Roux; J Pedro-Botet; J M Ramon; A Parri; M Villatoro; M J Carrera; M Pera; E Sagarra; L Grande; A Goday Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Ralph Peterli; Bettina Karin Wölnerhanssen; Diana Vetter; Philipp Nett; Markus Gass; Yves Borbély; Thomas Peters; Marc Schiesser; Bernd Schultes; Christoph Beglinger; Juergen Drewe; Marco Bueter Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Viktoria L Gloy; Matthias Briel; Deepak L Bhatt; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Philip R Schauer; Geltrude Mingrone; Heiner C Bucher; Alain J Nordmann Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-10-22
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Shilpa Bhupathiraju; David Wormser; Pei Gao; Stephen Kaptoge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Benjamin Cairns; Rachel Huxley; Chandra Jackson; Grace Joshy; Sarah Lewington; JoAnn Manson; Neil Murphy; Alpa Patel; Jonathan Samet; Mark Woodward; Wei Zheng; Maigen Zhou; Narinder Bansal; Aurelio Barricarte; Brian Carter; James Cerhan; George Smith; Xianghua Fang; Oscar Franco; Jane Green; Jim Halsey; Janet Hildebrand; Keum Jung; Rosemary Korda; Dale McLerran; Steven Moore; Linda O'Keeffe; Ellie Paige; Anna Ramond; Gillian Reeves; Betsy Rolland; Carlotta Sacerdote; Naveed Sattar; Eleni Sofianopoulou; June Stevens; Michael Thun; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Ling Yang; Young Yun; Peter Willeit; Emily Banks; Valerie Beral; Zhengming Chen; Susan Gapstur; Marc Gunter; Patricia Hartge; Sun Jee; Tai-Hing Lam; Richard Peto; John Potter; Walter Willett; Simon Thompson; John Danesh; Frank Hu Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jose-Maria Jiménez; Miguel-Angel Carbajo; María López; María-José Cao; Jaime Rúiz-Tovar; Sara García; María-José Castro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michelle M C Tan; Xingzhong Jin; Craig Taylor; Adrian K Low; Philip Le Page; David Martin; Ang Li; David Joseph; Nic Kormas Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-07-31 Impact factor: 4.964