Literature DB >> 17620203

Recent advances in research on radiofrequency fields and health: 2001-2003.

Daniel Krewski1, Barry W Glickman, Riadh W Y Habash, Brian Habbick, W Gregory Lotz, Rosemonde Mandeville, Frank S Prato, Tarek Salem, Donald F Weaver.   

Abstract

The widespread use of wireless telecommunications devices, particularly mobile phones, has resulted in increased human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields. Although national and international agencies have established safety guidelines for exposure to RF fields, concerns remain about the potential for adverse health outcomes to occur in relation to RF field exposure. The extensive literature on RF fields and health has been reviewed by a number of authorities, including the Royal Society of Canada (1999), the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity, and the Environment (CSTEE, 2001), the British Medical Association (2001), the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (Boice & McLaughlin, 2002), and the Health Council of The Netherlands (2002). This report provides an update on recent research results on the potential health risks of RF fields since the publication of the Royal Society of Canada report in 1999 (See Krewski et al., 2001a) and our previous 2001 update (Krewski et al., 2001b), covering the period 2001-2003. The present report examines new data on dosimetry and exposure assessment, biological effects such as enzyme induction, and toxicological effects, including genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and testicular and reproductive outcomes. Epidemiological studies of mobile phone users and occupationally exposed populations are examined, along with human and animal studies of neurological and behavioral effects. All of the authoritative reviews completed within the last 2 yr have concluded that there is no clear evidence of adverse health effects associated with RF fields. However, following a recent review of nine epidemiological studies of mobile phones and cancer, Kundi et al. (2004) concluded that the possibility of an enhanced cancer risk cannot be excluded. These same reviews support the need for further research to clarify the possible associations between RF fields and adverse health outcomes that have appeared in some reports. The results of the ongoing World Health Organization (WHO) study of mobile phones will provide important new information in this regard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17620203     DOI: 10.1080/15287390600974973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  10 in total

1.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes.

Authors:  Claudia Schwarz; Elisabeth Kratochvil; Alexander Pilger; Niels Kuster; Franz Adlkofer; Hugo W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Investigations on DNA damage and frequency of micronuclei in occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted from video display terminals (VDTs).

Authors:  Nk Lakshmi; R Tiwari; Sc Bhargava; Yr Ahuja
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study.

Authors:  Paul Elliott; Mireille B Toledano; J Bennett; L Beale; K de Hoogh; N Best; D J Briggs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-22

4.  Electromagnetic treatment to old Alzheimer's mice reverses β-amyloid deposition, modifies cerebral blood flow, and provides selected cognitive benefit.

Authors:  Gary W Arendash; Takashi Mori; Maggie Dorsey; Rich Gonzalez; Naoki Tajiri; Cesar Borlongan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reactive oxygen species formation and apoptosis in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell induced by 900 MHz mobile phone radiation.

Authors:  Yao-Sheng Lu; Bao-Tian Huang; Yao-Xiong Huang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 6.  A review on Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and the reproductive system.

Authors:  Ali Asghari; Amir Afshin Khaki; Asghar Rajabzadeh; Arash Khaki
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2016-07-25

7.  Antibacterial Susceptibility Pattern of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus after Exposure to Electromagnetic Waves Emitted from Mobile Phone Simulator.

Authors:  M M Movahedi; F Nouri; A Tavakoli Golpaygani; L Ataee; S Amani; M Taheri
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-12-01

8.  Mobile phone radiation might alter protein expression in human skin.

Authors:  Anu Karinen; Sirpa Heinävaara; Reetta Nylund; Dariusz Leszczynski
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Review of the Evidence that Transcranial Electromagnetic Treatment will be a Safe and Effective Therapeutic Against Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Gary W Arendash
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.472

10.  Mobile phone use, school electromagnetic field levels and related symptoms: a cross-sectional survey among 2150 high school students in Izmir.

Authors:  Raika Durusoy; Hür Hassoy; Ahmet Özkurt; Ali Osman Karababa
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.