| Literature DB >> 21637620 |
Nk Lakshmi1, R Tiwari, Sc Bhargava, Yr Ahuja.
Abstract
The potential effect of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted from video display terminals (VDTs) to elicit biological response is a major concern for the public. The software professionals are subjected to cumulative EMFs in their occupational environments. This study was undertaken to evaluate DNA damage and incidences of micronuclei in such professionals. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first attempt to carry out cytogenetic investigations on assessing bioeffects in personal computer users. The study subjects (n = 138) included software professionals using VDTs for more than 2 years with age, gender, socioeconomic status matched controls (n = 151). DNA damage and frequency of micronuclei were evaluated using alkaline comet assay and cytochalasin blocked micronucleus assay respectively. Overall DNA damage and incidence of micronuclei showed no significant differences between the exposed and control subjects. With exposure characteristics, such as total duration (years) and frequency of use (minutes/day) sub-groups were assessed for such parameters. Although cumulative frequency of use showed no significant changes in the DNA integrity of the classified sub-groups, the long-term users (> 10 years) showed higher induction of DNA damage and increased frequency of micronuclei and micro nucleated cells.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage; comet assay; electromagnetic fields (EMFs); micronuclei; video display terminals (VDTs)
Year: 2010 PMID: 21637620 PMCID: PMC3036072 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
General characteristics of the study group and controls.
| S. n. | Variables | Exposed subjects | Control |
| 1 | Number( | 138 | 151 |
| 2 | Age (range) | 21-47 | 17-44 |
| (Mean ± SD) | 25.13 ± 4.07 | 22.88 ± 4.45 | |
| 3 | Sex | ||
| Males | 87 (63.04%) | 101 (66.89%) | |
| Females | 51 (36.96%) | 50 (33.11%) | |
| 4 | Smoking habits | ||
| Smokers | 32 (23.2%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 5 | Drinking habits | ||
| Alcoholism | 34 (24.6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 6 | Dietary habits | ||
| Vegetarian | 53 (38.41%) | 74 (49.01%) | |
| Non-vegetarian | 85 (61.59%) | 77 (50.99%) |
Mean ± SD values of DNA damage in exposed and control subjects.
| Parameters | Exposed subjects
| Control
| t value | p value | |||
| N | Mean ± SD | N | Mean ± SD | ||||
| Comet tail length (arbitrary units) | 138 | 3.76 ± 1.38 | 151 | 3.69 ± 1.13 | 1.895 | 0.061NS | |
NS: Non-significant at 5%.
Mean ± SE values of frequency of micronuclei in exposed and control subjects.
| Groups | Sample size | Number of BN cells | Total number of micronuclei | Mean ± SE of MN cells (%) | Mean ± SE of MN (%) |
| IF-EMF | 34 | 35053 | 413 | 1.16 ± 0.48NS | 1.39 ± 0.63NS |
| Control | 60 | 64026 | 661 | 1.04 ± 0.52NS | 1.24 ± 0.67NS |
NS: Non-significant at 5%.
DNA damage and frequency of micronuclei in relation to duration of exposure to VDTs.
| Observation | Group based on duration of exposure (years)
| t value | p value | ||
| 1-6 | > 7 | ||||
| CTL | N | 73 | 65 | 21.96 | < 0.001 |
| M | 3.15 ± 0.24 | 4.09 ± 0.26 | |||
| %MNC | N | 20 | 14 | 28.39 | < 0.001 |
| M | 1.00 ± 0.19 | 2.73 ± 0.15 | |||
| %MN | N | 20 | 14 | 5.80 | < 0.001 |
| M | 1.19 ± 0.24 | 1.63 ± 0.18 | |||
CTL-comet tail length, MN- micronuclei, MNC- micronucleated cells, N- sample size, M-mean ± SE.
DNA damage and incidences of micronuclei in relation to frequency of exposure (minutes/day) to VDTs.
| Observation | Group based on frequency of exposure (minutes/day)
| t value | p value | ||
| A 180-420 | B 420-720 | ||||
| CTL | N | 64 | 74 | 1.259 | 0.210 |
| Mean ± SE | 3.5991 ± 0.16 | 3.8914 ± 0.17 | |||
| %MNC | N | 20 | 14 | 1.177 | 0.249 |
| Mean ± SE | 1.2382 ± 0.11 | 1.0474 ± 0.12 | |||
| %MN | N | 20 | 14 | 1.026 | 0.317 |
| Mean±SE | 1.5085 ± 0.14 | 1.2526 ± 0.16 | |||
CTL-comet tail length, MN- micronuclei, MNC- micronucleated cells, N- sample size, M-mean ± SE.
Pearson's correlation analysis in exposed and control subjects.
| Group | CTL | % MN | % MNC |
| Exposed | |||
| CTL | 0.002 | 0.026 | |
| %MN | 0.002 | 0.977** | |
| %MNC | 0.026 | 0.977** | |
| Control | |||
| CTL | 0.03 | 0.04 | |
| %MN | 0.03 | 0.70** | |
| %MNC | 0.04 | 0.70** | |
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).