Literature DB >> 2705960

Reliability of the Cobb angle index derived by traditional and computer assisted methods.

K E Dutton, T J Jones, B S Slinger, E R Scull, J O'Connor.   

Abstract

The reliability of the traditional Cobb angle index, which at present exhibits a wide range of reported values, was determined in this study and amounted to a within subject error of +/-4.3 degrees and a between subject error of +/-4.9 degrees. An attempt to pinpoint the source of this variability by investigating the influence of choice of end vertebrae proved inconclusive. The reliability of a computer assisted Cobb angle index, developed to improve measurement accuracy, was also examined and an estimated within subject error of +/-1.5 degrees and a between subject error of +/-1.6 degrees obtained. A comparison of the traditional and computer assisted methods indicates a high correlation between the Cobb angle derived using the two methods when measuring like curves and an improved reliability obtained by the computer method. Such an improvement is worth implementing clinically but of course the availability of a computer and digitizer and a little extra time for an operator to input the X-ray coordinates may be a barrier to its general use.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2705960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  10 in total

1.  Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis.

Authors:  Matthew Shaw; Clayton J Adam; Maree T Izatt; Paul Licina; Geoffrey N Askin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography' [by G. Cui, K. Watanabe, Y. Nishiwaki, N. Hosogane, T. Tsuji, K. Ishii, M. Nakamura, Y. Toyama, K. Chiba, M. Matsumoto; Eur spine j (2012) Jun;21(6):1111- 20].

Authors:  Adrian Gardner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Answer to the letter to the editor of A. Gardner concerning "Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography" (by G. Cui, K. Watanabe, Y. Nishiwaki, N. Hosogane, T. Tsuji, K. Ishii, M. Nakamura, Y. Toyama, K. Chiba, M. Matsumoto; Eur spine j (2012) Jun;21(6):1111-20. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2633-0).

Authors:  K Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Radiographic scoliosis angle estimation: spline-based measurement reveals superior reliability compared to traditional COBB method.

Authors:  Peter Bernstein; Johannes Metzler; Marlene Weinzierl; Carl Seifert; Wadim Kisel; Markus Wacker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.

Authors:  Ryoji Tauchi; Taichi Tsuji; Patrick J Cahill; John M Flynn; John M Flynn; Michael Glotzbecker; Ron El-Hawary; John A Heflin; Shiro Imagama; Ajeya P Joshi; Ayato Nohara; Norman Ramirez; David P Roye; Toshiki Saito; Jeffrey R Sawyer; John T Smith; Noriaki Kawakami
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-16

7.  Comparison between Oxford Cobbmeter and digital Cobbmeter for measurement of Cobb angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yasser Allam; Tarek El-Fiky; Mahmoud Yasser Farghally; Sameh Al-Sabagh; Ahmed Ezzat Siam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?

Authors:  Antonio De Carvalho; Raphaël Vialle; Laurent Thomsen; Julien Amzallag; Guillaume Cluzel; Hubert Ducou le Pointe; Pierre Mary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Image analysis in medical imaging: recent advances in selected examples.

Authors:  G Dougherty
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2010-07-01

10.  Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection.

Authors:  Bethany E Keenan; Maree T Izatt; Geoffrey N Askin; Robert D Labrom; Mark J Pearcy; Clayton J Adam
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-10-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.