Literature DB >> 17619163

The impact of pelvicaliceal features on problematic lower pole stone clearance in different age groups.

Serhat Gurocak1, Bora Kupeli, Cenk Acar, Mustafa Ozgur Tan, Ustunol Karaoglan, Ibrahim Bozkirli.   

Abstract

AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of pelvicaliceal variables in pediatric and adult age groups who underwent SWL for lower caliceal calculi.
METHODS: 25 pediatric and 78 adult patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) between 1996 and 2004 were enrolled into the study after exclusion of patients with hydronephrosis, major renal anatomic anomalies, non-calcium stones, history of recurrent stone disease and previous renal surgery. Lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular length (IL), infundibular width (IW) and pelvicaliceal volume were measured from pre-SWL intravenous urography. The pelvicaliceal stone load (PSL) index implicating the stone burden of each patient described as the relationship between stone volume and total estimated pelvicaliceal volume for stone-bearing kidney was also calculated.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of adult and 80% of pediatric patients became stone-free after SWL. The statistical insignificance between PSL index (p=0.097) of two groups shows that both groups shared a similar stone burden. According to SWL outcome, mean IPA values of stone-free and residual patients were 46.85 degrees and 30 degrees in pediatric group, respectively (p=0.01), whereas these values were 48.08 degrees and 43.06 degrees in the adult group, respectively (p=0.352). In the pediatric age group, stone-free and cumulative success rates increased with increasing IPA but this correlation was statistically insignificant (p: 0.263).
CONCLUSIONS: Lower caliceal anatomy has a higher impact on stone clearance after SWL in pediatric patients and urologists can expect better SWL outcomes from pediatric population with solitary lower caliceal stone than adults under the same conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17619163     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-007-9220-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  30 in total

1.  Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Yan Kit Fong; Sam Oon Hui Peh; Siew Hong Ho; Foo Cheong Ng; Pearllyn Leng Choo Quek; Kok Kit Ng
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.369

2.  The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomical variation between the stone-bearing and normal contralateral kidney on stone formation in adult patients with lower caliceal stones.

Authors:  Bora Kupeli; Lutfi Tunc; Cenk Acar; Serhat Gurocak; Turgut Alkibay; Cagri Guneri; Ibrahim Bozkirli
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  F J Sampaio; A H Aragao
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Effectiveness of SWL for lower-pole caliceal nephrolithiasis: evaluation of 452 cases.

Authors:  D Pacík; T Hanák; P Kumstát; M Turjanica; P Jelínek; J Kladenský
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate.

Authors:  H Danuser; D K Ackermann; D Böhlen; U E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  N P Gupta; D V Singh; A K Hemal; S Mandal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; E Schmiedt; D Jocham; W Brendel; B Forssmann; V Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Measurement of renal anatomy for prediction of lower-pole caliceal stone clearance: reproducibility of different parameters.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Anton Musial; Lutz Trojan; Taras Ptashnyk; Maurice Stephan Michel; Peter Alken; Kai Uwe Köhrmann
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract stones in children: a large scale retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Tefekli; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay; Faith Altunrende; Unsal Ozkuvanci
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C G Chaussy; G J Fuchs
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical course of pediatric urolithiasis: follow-up data in a long-term basis.

Authors:  Hakan Koyuncu; Faruk Yencilek; Sakip Erturhan; Bilal Eryildirım; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Optimal Management of Lower Polar Calyceal Stone 15 to 20 mm.

Authors:  Naveed Haroon; Syed M Nazim; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16

3.  Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Predicting successful outcomes.

Authors:  Sean McAdams; Aseem R Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  Optimal management of lower pole stones: the direction of future travel.

Authors:  Sacha L Moore; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Paul Cook; Hannah Wells; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-07-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.