Literature DB >> 17618862

Optimization of oligonucleotide microarray fabricated by spotting 65-mer.

Myoyong Lee1, Jeffrey M Trent, Michael L Bittner.   

Abstract

DNA microarrays currently provide measurements of sufficiently high quality to allow a wide variety of sound inferences about gene regulation and the coordination of cellular processes to be drawn. Nonetheless, a desire for greater precision in the measurements continues to drive the microarray research community to seek higher measurement quality through improvements in array fabrication and sample labeling and hybridization. We prepared oligonucleotide microarrays by printing 65-mer on aldehyde functional group-derivatized slides as described in a previous study. We could improve the reliability of data by removing enzymatic bias during probe labeling and hybridizing under a more stringent condition. This optimized method was used to profile gene expression patterns for nine different mouse tissues and organs, and multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of data showed both strong similarity between like samples and a clear, highly reproducible separation between different tissue samples. Three other microarrays were fabricated on commercial substrates and hybridized following the manufacturer's instructions. The data were then compared with in-house microarray data and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) data. The microarray printed on the custom aldehyde slide was superior to microarrays printed on commercially available substrate slides in terms of signal intensities, background, and hybridization characteristics. The data from the custom substrate microarray generally showed good agreement in quantitative changes up to 100-fold changes of transcript abundance with RT-PCR data. However, more accurate comparisons will be made as more genomic sequence information is gathered in the public data domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618862      PMCID: PMC2697255          DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  21 in total

1.  Gains in sensitivity with a device that mixes microarray hybridization solution in a 25-microm-thick chamber.

Authors:  Nils B Adey; Ming Lei; Mike T Howard; John D Jensen; Debbie A Mayo; Darin L Butel; Steve C Coffin; Tom C Moyer; Devan E Slade; Mark K Spute; Angela M Hancock; George T Eisenhoffer; Brian K Dalley; Michael R McNeely
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer.

Authors:  U Scherf; D T Ross; M Waltham; L H Smith; J K Lee; L Tanabe; K W Kohn; W C Reinhold; T G Myers; D T Andrews; D A Scudiero; M B Eisen; E A Sausville; Y Pommier; D Botstein; P O Brown; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms.

Authors:  Roger D Canales; Yuling Luo; James C Willey; Bradley Austermiller; Catalin C Barbacioru; Cecilie Boysen; Kathryn Hunkapiller; Roderick V Jensen; Charles R Knight; Kathleen Y Lee; Yunqing Ma; Botoul Maqsodi; Adam Papallo; Elizabeth Herness Peters; Karen Poulter; Patricia L Ruppel; Raymond R Samaha; Leming Shi; Wen Yang; Lu Zhang; Federico M Goodsaid
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Ratio-based decisions and the quantitative analysis of cDNA microarray images.

Authors:  Y Chen; E R Dougherty; M L Bittner
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  M Bittner; P Meltzer; Y Chen; Y Jiang; E Seftor; M Hendrix; M Radmacher; R Simon; Z Yakhini; A Ben-Dor; N Sampas; E Dougherty; E Wang; F Marincola; C Gooden; J Lueders; A Glatfelter; P Pollock; J Carpten; E Gillanders; D Leja; K Dietrich; C Beaudry; M Berens; D Alberts; V Sondak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Loss of a FYN-regulated differentiation and growth arrest pathway in advanced stage neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Bernd Berwanger; Oliver Hartmann; Eckhard Bergmann; Sandra Bernard; Dirk Nielsen; Michael Krause; Ali Kartal; Daniel Flynn; Ruprecht Wiedemeyer; Manfred Schwab; Helmut Schäfer; Holger Christiansen; Martin Eilers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Fluorescent labelling of cRNA for microarray applications.

Authors:  Peter A C 't Hoen; Floor de Kort; G J B van Ommen; Johan T den Dunnen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Improved quantitation and reproducibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA microarrays.

Authors:  Benjamin G Schroeder; Liane M Peterson; Robert D Fleischmann
Journal:  J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-03

10.  Gene expression profiling of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma with cDNA microarrays.

Authors:  J Khan; R Simon; M Bittner; Y Chen; S B Leighton; T Pohida; P D Smith; Y Jiang; G C Gooden; J M Trent; P S Meltzer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  3 in total

1.  LNA-modified isothermal oligonucleotide microarray for differentiating bacilli of similar origin.

Authors:  Jing Yan; Ying Yuan; Runqing Mu; Hong Shang; Yifu Guan
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Performance characteristics of 65-mer oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Myoyong Lee; Charlie C Xiang; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael L Bittner
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Automation of cDNA synthesis and labelling improves reproducibility.

Authors:  Daniel Klevebring; Marcus Gry; Johan Lindberg; Anna Eidefors; Joakim Lundeberg
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-10-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.