Literature DB >> 12510768

Gains in sensitivity with a device that mixes microarray hybridization solution in a 25-microm-thick chamber.

Nils B Adey1, Ming Lei, Mike T Howard, John D Jensen, Debbie A Mayo, Darin L Butel, Steve C Coffin, Tom C Moyer, Devan E Slade, Mark K Spute, Angela M Hancock, George T Eisenhoffer, Brian K Dalley, Michael R McNeely.   

Abstract

A microarray hybridization system that allows mixing in volumes comparable to those used by glass coverslips is presented. This system is composed of a disposable flexible lid that binds to 1 in. x 3 in. glass slides via an adhesive gasket, forming a uniform 25-microm-thick hybridization chamber. This chamber rests on a base unit for temperature control. The lid contains two air-driven bladders that continuously mix the hybridization fluid. Mixing enhances sensitivity from a typical microarray experiment 2-3-fold. Mixing is particularly effective at high spotted probe and low labeled target concentrations and overcoming local target depletion that occurs when homologous probes are spotted in close proximity. Mixing appears to be compatible with most hybridization conditions; however, mix versus no-mix control experiments should be performed. Also covered are a number of microfluidic issues related to manufacturing, filling, mixing, and packaging.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12510768     DOI: 10.1021/ac026082m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  8 in total

1.  Kinetics of multiplex hybridization: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  J Bishop; A M Chagovetz; S Blair
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Optimization of oligonucleotide microarray fabricated by spotting 65-mer.

Authors:  Myoyong Lee; Jeffrey M Trent; Michael L Bittner
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Systematic spatial bias in DNA microarray hybridization is caused by probe spot position-dependent variability in lateral diffusion.

Authors:  Doris Steger; David Berry; Susanne Haider; Matthias Horn; Michael Wagner; Roman Stocker; Alexander Loy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Unravelling microbial communities with DNA-microarrays: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Hauke Smidt; Alexander Loy; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.192

5.  Using a microfluidic device for 1 microl DNA microarray hybridization in 500 s.

Authors:  Cheng-Wey Wei; Ji-Yen Cheng; Chih-Ting Huang; Meng-Hua Yen; Tai-Horng Young
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Probe-target hybridization depends on spatial uniformity of initial concentration condition across large-format chips.

Authors:  Alisha Geldert; Haiyan Huang; Amy E Herr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Use of functional gene arrays for elucidating in situ biodegradation.

Authors:  Joy D Van Nostrand; Zhili He; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Signal oscillation is another reason for variability in microarray-based gene expression quantification.

Authors:  Raghvendra Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.