Literature DB >> 17617288

Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.

Thomas Haak1, Steven Edelman, Claudia Walter, Brigitte Lecointre, Gerry Spollett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes have been found to have a preference for insulin pens over a vial and syringe since these devices offer improvements in compliance, freedom, and flexibility.
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the usability, specific pen features, and patient preference for 4 prefilled, disposable, insulin pens: Solostar, Humulin/Humalog pen (Lilly pen), FlexPen, and a fourth, prototype pen, Pen X, in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes. In 1-hour interviews, patients carried out simulated use (preparing the pens, setting a dose, and injecting into a receptacle, not the body) under observation, and answered qualitative and quantitative questions. Patients were supplied with the relevant user manual. The usability (ability and time taken to carry out handling tasks) and preference (based on 14 key pen features and overall preference) of each pen were assessed without blinding for pen make/manufacturer. During the interviews, the patients prepared each pen and performed injections into a receptacle. Comparisons were made between the pens at every step. Subgroup analyses of the usability exercises were carried out based on age (11-15 years; >/=60 years), previous pen experience, and disability (visual and dexterity).
RESULTS: In total, 510 diabetes patients (65% type 2 diabetes; 51% female; mean age, 43 years [range, 11-82 years]) from 4 countries (United States, Germany, France, and Japan) completed the study. Overall, a greater proportion of patients correctly prepared the pen and performed an injection into a receptacle with Solostar versus all comparator pens (P < 0.05). Similar findings were observed in the usability subgroup analyses based on age, previous pen experience, and visual/dexterity disabilities. A significantly (P < 0.05) higher proportion of patients expressed overall preference for Solostar (53%) versus FlexPen (31%) or Lilly pen (15%).
CONCLUSION: Of the 4 pens compared, both the Solostar pen and FlexPen were found to have high patient usability, and the new Solostar pen was found to have high patient preference in these patients with diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617288     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  22 in total

1.  Correct use of a new reusable insulin injection pen by patients with diabetes: a design validation study.

Authors:  Sherwyn Schwartz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Dose accuracy and injection force of disposable pens delivering pramlintide for the treatment of diabetes.

Authors:  Douglas Merritt; Barb Schreiner; Scott Harris; Mary Beth DeYoung; Susan Strobel; Joseph Lauinger
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

3.  Patients' Preferences for Insulin Injection Devices.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-09

4.  Injection force of SoloSTAR® compared with other disposable insulin pen devices at constant volume flow rates.

Authors:  Thomas van der Burg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-01

5.  Overview of insulin and non-insulin delivery devices in the treatment of diabetes.

Authors:  Michele Pisano
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-12

6.  Analysis of insulin pen devices for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jerome E Thurman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

7.  Usability, participant acceptance, and safety of a prefilled insulin injection device in a 3-month observational survey in everyday clinical practice in Australia.

Authors:  John Carter; Jonathan Beilin; Adam Morton; Mario De Luise
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

8.  Performance of a new reusable insulin pen.

Authors:  Alfred Penfornis
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus other disposable pens.

Authors:  Jerome S Fischer; Steven V Edelman; Sherwyn L Schwartz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

10.  Comparative Assessment of Lixisenatide, Exenatide, and Liraglutide Pen Devices: A Pilot User-Based Study.

Authors:  Udo Stauder; Diplom Enginee; Hina Elton; Alfred Penfornis; Steve Edelman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.