Literature DB >> 17615049

Concurrent validity of the COHIP.

Neil Dunlow1, Ceib Phillips, Hillary L Broder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between children's perception of their OHRQOL and their perceptions of their dentofacial image, social anxiety, and self-concept as an assessment of the concurrent validity for the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP).
METHODS: A nonrandom, consecutive sample of children, ages nine to 14 years, was recruited for this observational validation study. Participants had been accepted for treatment in the University of North Carolina Graduate Orthodontic clinic. Data were collected after gathering initial orthodontic records and prior to delivery of any fixed or removable orthodontic appliances. Participants completed the COHIP and standardized dimension-specific questionnaires with known psychometric properties designed to assess self-concept, social anxiety, and perception of facial image. Child assent with caregiver consent was obtained prior to data collection. Pearson's correlations between each of the domains of the COHIP and the Dento-facial Image, the Social Anxiety Scale, and the self-concept domains of the Multidimensional Self Concept Scale (MSCS) were calculated. Criteria for support of concurrent validity was established based on directionality of expected relationships and strength of the observed correlation coefficient. Each correlation was assessed as meeting or not meeting the criteria. A one-tailed one sample Z-test was used to test the null hypothesis that 58% of the calculated correlations would meet the criteria (expected a priori) with an alterative that less than 58% would meet the criteria.
RESULTS: The average age of the 52 subjects enrolled was 11.8; 40% were male; and 85% were Caucasian. The hypothesis that 58% of the calculated correlations defined a priori as expected relationships would meet the criteria was supported by the data (P = 0.63). The perception of dentofacial appearance was positively correlated (range = 0.39 to 0.45; with all of the COHIP domains except for the School domain. Overall, the COHIP domains, particularly Self-Image and Social Emotional subscales, were positively correlated (0.32-0.52) with the MSCS self-concept domain scores, except Family Self-Concept. The COHIP domains, particularly Functional Well-being and Social Emotional subscales, were negatively correlated (-0.76 to -0.33) with the three Social Anxiety subscales that include both fear of negative evaluation and social avoidance.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study lend support to the validity of the COHIP since 77% of the expected relationships between the domains of the COHIP and the domains of general, standardized dimension-specific instruments were observed. The decision to use condition-specific, dimension-specific, or general quality of life (QOL) measures is dependent on the purpose of the study. For investigations in children on the effect of dental treatments or in epidemiologic studies of an oral health outcome, the use of condition-specific QOL measures like the COHIP have the advantages of increased patient responsiveness since the assessment is focused on a specific condition, oral health, and increased sensitivity to treatment effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17615049      PMCID: PMC3556721          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00404.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  19 in total

1.  Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: II. Validity and responsiveness testing.

Authors:  Susan J Cunningham; Andrew M Garratt; Nigel P Hunt
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.383

2.  Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: I. Reliability of the instrument.

Authors:  S J Cunningham; A M Garratt; N P Hunt
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.383

3.  Adolescent quality of life, part I: conceptual and measurement model.

Authors:  Todd C Edwards; Colleen E Huebner; Frederick A Connell; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2002-06

4.  Ways of coping with asthma in everyday life: validation of the Asthma Specific Coping Scale.

Authors:  Anna-Mari Aalto; Kristiina Härkäpää; Arja R Aro; Pekka Rissanen
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors.

Authors:  J F Sallis; R M Grossman; R B Pinski; T L Patterson; P R Nader
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life.

Authors:  A Jokovic; D Locker; M Stephens; D Kenny; B Tompson; G Guyatt
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Groningen Orthopaedic Social Support Scale: validity and reliability.

Authors:  Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Martin Stevens; Alette Spriensma; Jim R van Horn
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP Child's version).

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.383

9.  A qualitative study of teenagers' decisions to undergo orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance.

Authors:  U Trulsson; M Strandmark; B Mohlin; U Berggren
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2002-09

10.  The reliability, validity, and preliminary responsiveness of the Eye Allergy Patient Impact Questionnaire (EAPIQ).

Authors:  Michael Alexander; William Berger; Patricia Buchholz; John Walt; Caroline Burk; Jeff Lee; Rob Arbuckle; Linda Abetz
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  18 in total

1.  Reliability and validity testing for the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Reduced (COHIP-SF 19).

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Lacey Sischo
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.821

2.  Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Self-Rated Speech in Children With Existing Fistulas in Mid-Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Ross E Long; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Barry H Grayson; Roberto Flores; Hillary L Broder
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2015-10-05

3.  Level of oral health impacts among patients participating in PEARL: a dental practice-based research network.

Authors:  Maria T Botello-Harbaum; Abigail G Matthews; Damon Collie; Donald A Vena; Ronald G Craig; Frederick A Curro; Van P Thompson; Hillary L Broder
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.383

4.  Chemical composition of gallstones from Al-jouf province of saudi arabia.

Authors:  Bashir M Jarrar; Meshref A Al-Rowaili
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2011-04

5.  Oral health-related quality of life in patients with cleft lip and/or palate or Robin sequence.

Authors:  D Payer; M Krimmel; S Reinert; B Koos; H Weise; C Weise
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings.

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Lacey Sischo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The German 19-item version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile: translation and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Ira Sierwald; Mike T John; Darius Sagheri; Julia Neuschulz; Elisabeth Schüler; Christian Splieth; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Daniel R Reissmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Evaluation of the similarities and differences in response patterns to the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory and the Child Oral Health Impact Scores among youth with cleft.

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Robert G Norman; Lacey Sischo; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children with cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  Annemieke Bos; Charlotte Prahl
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of orthodontic treatment need by patient-based methods compared with normative method.

Authors:  Imaneh Asgari; Arezoo Ebn Ahmady; Ghasem Yadegarfar; Faezeh Eslamipour
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.