Literature DB >> 12218197

A qualitative study of teenagers' decisions to undergo orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance.

U Trulsson1, M Strandmark, B Mohlin, U Berggren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe thoughts and values influencing young people's choices to undergo orthodontic treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (11 boys), aged 13-19 years, at an orthodontic clinic in the western part of Sweden participated. Open, taped interviews, lasting about 1 hour, were conducted with each subject and analysed by the grounded theory method. Five descriptive categories, each related to several subcategories, were generated in the analysis and labelled: 'being like everyone else', 'being diagnosed', 'focusing on the mouth', 'obeying social norms' and 'forced decision-making'. OUTCOME: Category forced decision-making was identified as a core category, describing the power in the social process, resulting in the decision to undergo orthodontic treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Motivation for the decision to undergo orthodontic treatment seemed to be social norms, and the beauty culture in their reference group and in society in general. The teenagers were not fully conscious of these external influences. Their opinion, as a group, was that they had made an independent decision to undergo orthodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12218197     DOI: 10.1093/ortho/29.3.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  15 in total

1.  What is the value of orthodontic treatment?

Authors:  P E Benson; H Javidi; A T DiBiase
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis.

Authors:  Yağmur Lena; Furkan Dindaroğlu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Concurrent validity of the COHIP.

Authors:  Neil Dunlow; Ceib Phillips; Hillary L Broder
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.383

4.  Patients' self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness before and after exposure to facial photographs.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Andrea Alberti; Claudio Sartini; Serena Incerti Parenti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Orthodontic treatment need for adolescents in the Campania region: the malocclusion impact on self-concept.

Authors:  Letizia Perillo; Maria Esposito; Alberto Caprioglio; Stefania Attanasio; Annamaria Chiara Santini; Marco Carotenuto
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Challenges of Iranian adolescents for preventing dental caries.

Authors:  Arezoo Fallahi; Fazlollah Ghofranipour; Fazlollah Ahmadi; Beheshteh Malekafzali; Ebrahim Hajizadeh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 0.611

7.  A qualitative analysis of orthodontic-related posts on Twitter.

Authors:  M Rachel Henzell; A Margaret Knight; K C Morgaine; J S Antoun; M Farella
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  A feasible method to improve adherence of Hawley retainer in adolescent orthodontic patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Feiou Lin; Hao Sun; Zhenyu Ni; Minling Zheng; Linjie Yao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  The Facial Aesthetic index: An additional tool for assessing treatment need.

Authors:  Shobha Sundareswaran; Ranjith Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  A qualitative study of the views of adolescents on their caries risk and prevention behaviours.

Authors:  Emma Hall-Scullin; Joanna Goldthorpe; Keith Milsom; Martin Tickle
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.