Literature DB >> 17614199

Modulation of pain ratings by expectation and uncertainty: Behavioral characteristics and anticipatory neural correlates.

Christopher A Brown1, Ben Seymour, Yvonne Boyle, Wael El-Deredy, Anthony K P Jones.   

Abstract

Expectations about the magnitude of impending pain exert a substantial effect on subsequent perception. However, the neural mechanisms that underlie the predictive processes that modulate pain are poorly understood. In a combined behavioral and high-density electrophysiological study we measured anticipatory neural responses to heat stimuli to determine how predictions of pain intensity, and certainty about those predictions, modulate brain activity and subjective pain ratings. Prior to receiving randomized laser heat stimuli at different intensities (low, medium or high) subjects (n=15) viewed cues that either accurately informed them of forthcoming intensity (certain expectation) or not (uncertain expectation). Pain ratings were biased towards prior expectations of either high or low intensity. Anticipatory neural responses increased with expectations of painful vs. non-painful heat intensity, suggesting the presence of neural responses that represent predicted heat stimulus intensity. These anticipatory responses also correlated with the amplitude of the Laser-Evoked Potential (LEP) response to painful stimuli when the intensity was predictable. Source analysis (LORETA) revealed that uncertainty about expected heat intensity involves an anticipatory cortical network commonly associated with attention (left dorsolateral prefrontal, posterior cingulate and bilateral inferior parietal cortices). Relative certainty, however, involves cortical areas previously associated with semantic and prospective memory (left inferior frontal and inferior temporal cortex, and right anterior prefrontal cortex). This suggests that biasing of pain reports and LEPs by expectation involves temporally precise activity in specific cortical networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17614199     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  52 in total

1.  Dynamic Threat Processing.

Authors:  Christian Meyer; Srikanth Padmala; Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Predictability modulates the anticipation and perception of pain in both self and others.

Authors:  Weiwei Peng; Xiaoxuan Huang; Yang Liu; Fang Cui
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  The illness uncertainty concept: a review.

Authors:  Lisa Johnson Wright; Niloofar Afari; Alex Zautra
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-04

4.  Pain anticipatory phenomena in patients with central poststroke pain: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Richard C Burgess; Scott F Lempka; John T Gale; Darlene P Floden; Andre G Machado
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Predicting individual differences in placebo analgesia: contributions of brain activity during anticipation and pain experience.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas; Lauren A Leotti; James K Rilling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Brain structure correlates of individual differences in the acquisition and inhibition of conditioned fear.

Authors:  Catherine A Hartley; Bruce Fischl; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Uncertainty during pain anticipation: the adaptive value of preparatory processes.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Seidel; Daniela M Pfabigan; Andreas Hahn; Ronald Sladky; Arvina Grahl; Katharina Paul; Christoph Kraus; Martin Küblböck; Georg S Kranz; Allan Hummer; Rupert Lanzenberger; Christian Windischberger; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Predictive mechanisms linking brain opioids to chronic pain vulnerability and resilience.

Authors:  Anthony Kenneth Peter Jones; Christopher Andrew Brown
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty.

Authors:  I Ronga; E Valentini; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Early event related fields during visually evoked pain anticipation.

Authors:  Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Richard C Burgess; Ela B Plow; Darlene P Floden; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.