Raghavan Gopalakrishnan1, Richard C Burgess2, Ela B Plow3, Darlene P Floden1, Andre G Machado4. 1. Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. 2. Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. 3. Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. 4. Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Electronic address: machada@ccf.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pain experience is not only a function of somatosensory inputs. Rather, it is strongly influenced by cognitive and affective pathways. Pain anticipatory phenomena, an important limitation to rehabilitative efforts in the chronic state, are processed by associative and limbic networks, along with primary sensory cortices. Characterization of neurophysiological correlates of pain anticipation, particularly during very early stages of neural processing is critical for development of therapeutic interventions. METHODS: Here, we utilized magnetoencephalography to study early event-related fields (ERFs) in healthy subjects exposed to a 3 s visual countdown task that preceded a painful stimulus, a non-painful stimulus or no stimulus. RESULTS: We found that the first countdown cue, but not the last cue, evoked critical ERFs signaling anticipation, attention and alertness to the noxious stimuli. Further, we found that P2 and N2 components were significantly different in response to first-cues that signaled incoming painful stimuli when compared to non-painful or no stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that early ERFs are relevant neural substrates of pain anticipatory phenomena and could be potentially serve as biomarkers. SIGNIFICANCE: These measures could assist in the development of neurostimulation approaches aimed at curbing the negative effects of pain anticipation during rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE:Pain experience is not only a function of somatosensory inputs. Rather, it is strongly influenced by cognitive and affective pathways. Pain anticipatory phenomena, an important limitation to rehabilitative efforts in the chronic state, are processed by associative and limbic networks, along with primary sensory cortices. Characterization of neurophysiological correlates of pain anticipation, particularly during very early stages of neural processing is critical for development of therapeutic interventions. METHODS: Here, we utilized magnetoencephalography to study early event-related fields (ERFs) in healthy subjects exposed to a 3 s visual countdown task that preceded a painful stimulus, a non-painful stimulus or no stimulus. RESULTS: We found that the first countdown cue, but not the last cue, evoked critical ERFs signaling anticipation, attention and alertness to the noxious stimuli. Further, we found that P2 and N2 components were significantly different in response to first-cues that signaled incoming painful stimuli when compared to non-painful or no stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that early ERFs are relevant neural substrates of pain anticipatory phenomena and could be potentially serve as biomarkers. SIGNIFICANCE: These measures could assist in the development of neurostimulation approaches aimed at curbing the negative effects of pain anticipation during rehabilitation.
Authors: Andre G Machado; Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Ela B Plow; Richard C Burgess; John C Mosher Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Richard C Burgess; Scott F Lempka; John T Gale; Darlene P Floden; Andre G Machado Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Raghavan Gopalakrishnan; Richard C Burgess; Donald A Malone; Scott F Lempka; John T Gale; Darlene P Floden; Kenneth B Baker; Andre G Machado Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Nandini Raghuraman; Yang Wang; Lieven A Schenk; Andrew J Furman; Christina Tricou; David A Seminowicz; Luana Colloca Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 4.379