BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas impingement is a recurrent complication following THA, caused by muscle friction against a protrusive prosthetic cup.This study was designed to quantify the dimensional variations in acetabular rim profiles, with particular regard to the iliopubic valley, in order to suggest means to prevent iliopsoas impingement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 34 cadaver pelvises were analyzed using a hip navigation system. The morphometric data were processed to plot profiles of all acetabular rims with particular regard to the shape and depth of the psoas valley. RESULTS: The acetabular rim is an asymmetric succession of 3 peaks and 3 troughs. The psoas valley is a salient feature in most pelvises and there is only a weak correlation between its depth (mean 3.8 mm, SD 2.0) and acetabular diameter, anteversion, or inclination. INTERPRETATION: It would be difficult to obviate the anterior overlap of the acetabulum using a hemispheric cup, a fortiori in certain morphotypes, without compromising range of motion or risk of dislocation. The solution for prevention of iliopsoas impingement would be to adapt cup design to acetabular anatomy, which may require different implants for the right and left sides, and hence a doubled inventory.
BACKGROUND: Iliopsoas impingement is a recurrent complication following THA, caused by muscle friction against a protrusive prosthetic cup.This study was designed to quantify the dimensional variations in acetabular rim profiles, with particular regard to the iliopubic valley, in order to suggest means to prevent iliopsoas impingement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 34 cadaver pelvises were analyzed using a hip navigation system. The morphometric data were processed to plot profiles of all acetabular rims with particular regard to the shape and depth of the psoas valley. RESULTS: The acetabular rim is an asymmetric succession of 3 peaks and 3 troughs. The psoas valley is a salient feature in most pelvises and there is only a weak correlation between its depth (mean 3.8 mm, SD 2.0) and acetabular diameter, anteversion, or inclination. INTERPRETATION: It would be difficult to obviate the anterior overlap of the acetabulum using a hemispheric cup, a fortiori in certain morphotypes, without compromising range of motion or risk of dislocation. The solution for prevention of iliopsoas impingement would be to adapt cup design to acetabular anatomy, which may require different implants for the right and left sides, and hence a doubled inventory.
Authors: Philippe Hernigou; Arnaud Dubory; Damien Potage; François Roubineau; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Eric Vandenbussche; Mohammed Saffarini; Ulrich Hansen; Fabienne Taillieu; Céline Mutschler; Bernard Augereau; Thomas M Gregory Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.717