OBJECT: The DIAM is a polyester-encased silicone interspinous dynamic stabilization device that can unload the anterior column and reestablish the functional integrity of the posterior column. METHODS: The DIAM was implanted in 104 patients between May 1, 2001 and October 30, 2001. A retrospective evaluation was performed based on chart review and patient questionnaire at a median follow-up interval of 18.1 months. There were no implant migrations, infections, or neurological injuries. Of the 20 patients who suffered adverse events, 13 underwent second lumbar spinal operations 0 to 19 months after the initial surgery (in seven the event occurred in a location other than the lumbar spine). The pain level as recorded by the physician showed improvement in 88.5%, no change in 9.6%, aggravation in 0%, and was indeterminate in 1.9%. The questionnaire revealed that at 18 months postoperatively, analgesic usage was decreased in 63.1%, increased in 12.3%, and unchanged in 24.6% of patients, and activities of daily living were improved in 46.2%, decreased in 30.8%, and unchanged in 23.1%. Specific outcomes measures for sitting, standing, physical activity, and psychosocial functioning revealed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The DIAM implant appears to be a useful and effective alternative in the surgical management of a wide range of lumbar disorders. Patient complications are few and satisfaction is high.
OBJECT: The DIAM is a polyester-encased silicone interspinous dynamic stabilization device that can unload the anterior column and reestablish the functional integrity of the posterior column. METHODS: The DIAM was implanted in 104 patients between May 1, 2001 and October 30, 2001. A retrospective evaluation was performed based on chart review and patient questionnaire at a median follow-up interval of 18.1 months. There were no implant migrations, infections, or neurological injuries. Of the 20 patients who suffered adverse events, 13 underwent second lumbar spinal operations 0 to 19 months after the initial surgery (in seven the event occurred in a location other than the lumbar spine). The pain level as recorded by the physician showed improvement in 88.5%, no change in 9.6%, aggravation in 0%, and was indeterminate in 1.9%. The questionnaire revealed that at 18 months postoperatively, analgesic usage was decreased in 63.1%, increased in 12.3%, and unchanged in 24.6% of patients, and activities of daily living were improved in 46.2%, decreased in 30.8%, and unchanged in 23.1%. Specific outcomes measures for sitting, standing, physical activity, and psychosocial functioning revealed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The DIAM implant appears to be a useful and effective alternative in the surgical management of a wide range of lumbar disorders. Patient complications are few and satisfaction is high.
Authors: Ferdinand Krappel; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Giovanni Alessi; Jean-Michel Remacle; Luis Alberto Lopez; Jesus Javier Fernández; Gianluca Maestretti; Christian W A Pfirrmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.134