Literature DB >> 21279392

Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series.

Josip Buric1, Massimiliano Pulidori.   

Abstract

Patients with low back pain (LBP) suffer chronic disability. In 40% of LBP patients degenerative disc disease (DDD) seems to be the cause. This prospective case series assessed the efficacy of the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM™) in patients with LBP resulting from DDD. All patients were initially assessed by physical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, dynamic X-rays and provocative discography. Eligible patients (n = 52) had LBP for a minimum of 4 months, and received surgery with the DIAM™ system 2-4 weeks after diagnosis. Patients were evaluated pre-/post-operatively for pain severity using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and for dysfunction and disability with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). VAS and RMDQ score changes were assessed using the appropriate contrasts and Bonferroni-corrected P values. As a result, significant (P < 0.0001) pain score reductions were observed between baseline values, and 2 (3.7, 95% CI 3.1; 4.2) and 48 (3.1, 95% CI 2.5; 3.6) months follow-up (intent-to-treat population). Disability scores were significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced between baseline and 2 (8.6, 95% CI 7.4; 9.9) and 48 (7.5, 95% CI 6.1; 8.9) months. Disability scores were similar from months 2 to 48. At 48 months, 67.3% of patients reached the minimum clinically important difference (MCID; ≥1.5-unit improvement) in VAS score and 78.9% of patients reached the MCID (≥30% improvement) in RMDQ score. No complications were associated with surgery. In conclusion, patients with LBP treated with the interspinous DIAM™ system showed significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and disability for up to 4 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21279392      PMCID: PMC3175853          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1697-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Steven D Glassman; David W Polly; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Chapter 2. European guidelines for prevention in low back pain : November 2004.

Authors:  A K Burton; F Balagué; G Cardon; H R Eriksen; Y Henrotin; A Lahad; A Leclerc; G Müller; A J van der Beek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  O Airaksinen; J I Brox; C Cedraschi; J Hildebrandt; J Klaber-Moffett; F Kovacs; A F Mannion; S Reis; J B Staal; H Ursin; G Zanoli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rod S Taylor; Peter Fritzell; Rebecca J Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Alexander Abbushi; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Meta-analysis of the results of lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  J A Turner; L Herron; R A Deyo
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1993

7.  One-year results of X Stop interspinous implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Manal Siddiqui; Francis W Smith; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].

Authors:  L Hrabálek; J Machác; M Vaverka
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.531

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.

Authors:  Choll Kim; Andrew Mahar; Andrew Perry; Jennifer Massie; Lichun Lu; Brad Currier; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-12

10.  Device for intervertebral assisted motion: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Jean Taylor; Patrick Pupin; Stephane Delajoux; Sylvain Palmer
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization Compared with Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 5-year Follow-up of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michael J Musacchio; Carl Lauryssen; Reginald J Davis; Hyun W Bae; John H Peloza; Richard D Guyer; Jack E Zigler; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Scott Leary
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-26

Review 3.  Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review.

Authors:  Michael Pintauro; Alexander Duffy; Payman Vahedi; George Rymarczuk; Joshua Heller
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  Herniectomy versus herniectomy with the DIAM spinal stabilization system in patients with sciatica and concomitant low back pain: results of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ferdinand Krappel; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Giovanni Alessi; Jean-Michel Remacle; Luis Alberto Lopez; Jesus Javier Fernández; Gianluca Maestretti; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of Long-Term Results of Lumbar Discectomy With and Without an Interspinous Device.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Plasencia Arriba; Carmen Maestre; Fernando Martín-Gorroño; Paula Plasencia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-07-31

6.  Evaluation of DIAM™ Spinal Stabilization System for lower lumbar disc degenerative disease: A randomized, prospective, single-site study.

Authors:  Barrett S Boody; Joseph D Smucker; Willa Sasso; Justin W Miller; Ryan Snowden; Rick C Sasso
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-27

7.  Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block; Reuven Gepstein
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol.

Authors:  Roel F M R Kersten; Steven M van Gaalen; Mark P Arts; Kit C B Roes; Arthur de Gast; Terry P Corbin; F Cumhur Öner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Neda Zamani; Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-03-06

Review 10.  Low Back Pain: Current Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Santosh Baliga; Katrina Treon; Niall John Angus Craig
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.