Literature DB >> 17607386

Evaluation of vacuum filter sock surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from porous and non-porous surfaces.

Gary S Brown1, Rita G Betty, John E Brockmann, Daniel A Lucero, Caroline A Souza, Kathryn S Walsh, Raymond M Boucher, Matthew S Tezak, Mollye C Wilson.   

Abstract

Vacuum filter socks were evaluated for recovery efficiency of powdered Bacillus atrophaeus spores from two non-porous surfaces, stainless steel and painted wallboard and two porous surfaces, carpet and bare concrete. Two surface coupons were positioned side-by-side and seeded with aerosolized Bacillus atrophaeus spores. One of the surfaces, a stainless steel reference coupon, was sized to fit into a sample vial for direct spore removal, while the other surface, a sample surface coupon, was sized for a vacuum collection application. Deposited spore material was directly removed from the reference coupon surface and cultured for enumeration of colony forming units (CFU), while deposited spore material was collected from the sample coupon using the vacuum filter sock method, extracted by sonication and cultured for enumeration. Recovery efficiency, which is a measure of overall transfer effectiveness from the surface to culture, was calculated as the number of CFU enumerated from the filter sock sample per unit area relative to the number of CFU enumerated from the co-located reference coupon per unit area. The observed mean filter sock recovery efficiency from stainless steel was 0.29 (SD = 0.14, n = 36), from painted wallboard was 0.25 (SD = 0.15, n = 36), from carpet was 0.28 (SD = 0.13, n = 40) and from bare concrete was 0.19 (SD = 0.14, n = 44). Vacuum filter sock recovery quantitative limits of detection were estimated at 105 CFU m(-2) from stainless steel and carpet, 120 CFU m(-2) from painted wallboard and 160 CFU m(-2) from bare concrete. The method recovery efficiency and limits of detection established in this work provide useful guidance for the planning of incident response environmental sampling for biological agents such as Bacillus anthracis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17607386     DOI: 10.1039/b700163k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  13 in total

1.  Surface sampling of spores in dry-deposition aerosols.

Authors:  Jason M Edmonds; Patricia J Collett; Erica R Valdes; Evan W Skowronski; Gregory J Pellar; Peter A Emanuel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of procedures for the collection, processing, and analysis of biomolecules from low-biomass surfaces.

Authors:  K Kwan; M Cooper; M T La Duc; P Vaishampayan; C Stam; J N Benardini; G Scalzi; C Moissl-Eichinger; K Venkateswaran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Validation of a nylon-flocked-swab protocol for efficient recovery of bacterial spores from smooth and rough surfaces.

Authors:  Alexander Probst; Rainer Facius; Reinhard Wirth; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  False-negative rate and recovery efficiency performance of a validated sponge wipe sampling method.

Authors:  Paula A Krauter; Greg F Piepel; Raymond Boucher; Matt Tezak; Brett G Amidan; Wayne Einfeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Development of an aerosol surface inoculation method for bacillus spores.

Authors:  Sang Don Lee; Shawn P Ryan; Emily Gibb Snyder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Recovery of bacillus spore contaminants from rough surfaces: a challenge to space mission cleanliness control.

Authors:  Alexander Probst; Rainer Facius; Reinhard Wirth; Marco Wolf; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evaluation of standardized sample collection, packaging, and decontamination procedures to assess cross-contamination potential during Bacillus anthracis incident response operations.

Authors:  M Worth Calfee; Jenia Tufts; Kathryn Meyer; Katrina McConkey; Leroy Mickelsen; Laura Rose; Chad Dowell; Lisa Delaney; Angela Weber; Stephen Morse; Jasmine Chaitram; Marshall Gray
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Recovery efficiency and limit of detection of aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from environmental surface samples.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Paul A Baron; Jeremy K Beard; Misty J Hein; Lloyd D Larsen; Laura Rose; Frank W Schaefer; Judith Noble-Wang; Lisa Hodges; H D Alan Lindquist; Gregory J Deye; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Implications of limits of detection of various methods for Bacillus anthracis in computing risks to human health.

Authors:  Amanda B Herzog; S Devin McLennan; Alok K Pandey; Charles P Gerba; Charles N Haas; Joan B Rose; Syed A Hashsham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Comparative evaluation of vacuum-based surface sampling methods for collection of Bacillus spores.

Authors:  M Worth Calfee; Laura J Rose; Stephen Morse; Dino Mattorano; Matt Clayton; Abderrahmane Touati; Nicole Griffin-Gatchalian; Christina Slone; Neal McSweeney
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.