Literature DB >> 20199851

Combined vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurement: a patient-friendly new tool with an important impact on the Canadian Risk Fracture Classification.

Pieter L Jager1, Riemer H J A Slart, Colin L Webber, Jonathan D Adachi, Alexandra L Papaioannou, Karen Y Gulenchyn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vertebral fractures often go unnoticed, while they constitute a significant risk factor for new fractures, independent of the bone density. Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) is a new feature on DXA bone densitometry equipment. Our purpose was to determine the added value of VFA and its impact on the Canadian fracture risk classification using data from a Dutch academic cohort.
METHODS: All 958 consecutive patients (64% female, mean age 53 [20-94], mean weight 75 kg [32-150]) who underwent BMD measurement at the University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands also underwent VFA in the same session.
RESULTS: The prevalence of vertebral fractures was 26%. In 68% of these patients this fracture was unknown. The severity was "mild" (20%-25% height loss) in 43%, "moderate" (25%-35%) in 44% and "severe" (>35% height loss) in 13%. Even after excluding mild fractures, the prevalence of vertebral fractures was 17%. In the 28% with normal BMD the vertebral fracture prevalence was still 18%, in the 43% with osteopenia 23%, and in the 29% with osteoporosis 36%. The Canadian risk classification was "low fracture risk" in 68%, "moderate" in 19%, and "high" in 13%. Adding VFA altered the classification in 20% of the patients, to become 54%, 27%, and 19%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: VFA added to BMD is a patient friendly diagnostic tool with a high diagnostic yield, as it detected unknown vertebral fractures and altered diagnostic classification in approximately 1 out of every 5 patients. These results suggest that BMD plus VFA may become the new standard in osteoporosis testing.
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Association of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20199851      PMCID: PMC5102695          DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2009.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  27 in total

1.  Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; F Duboeuf; H O Marion-Audibert; B Kalpakçioglu; B H Mitlak; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; C Rowan Debold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; D Krueger; R Gangnon; H K Genant; M K Drezner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Predicting vertebral fracture incidence from prevalent fractures and bone density among non-black, osteoporotic women.

Authors:  P D Ross; H K Genant; J W Davis; P D Miller; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

Review 9.  Etidronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  G A Wells; A Cranney; J Peterson; M Boucher; B Shea; V Robinson; D Coyle; P Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

Review 10.  Vertebral Fracture Assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: insurance coverage issues in the United States. A White Paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  Andrew J Laster; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Fracture Liaison Services in an open system: how was it done? what were the barriers and how were they overcome?

Authors:  Manju Chandran
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures--an "OPTIMAL" model of care from Singapore.

Authors:  M Chandran; M Z W Tan; M Cheen; S B Tan; M Leong; T C Lau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services.

Authors:  Paul J Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Effects of Age and Body Mass Index on Thoracolumbar Spine X-Ray for Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Elderly Women: Tianliao Old People (TOP) Study 07.

Authors:  Yin-Fan Chang; Chin-Sung Chang; Mei-Wen Wang; Chun-Feng Wu; Chuan-Yu Chen; Hsuan-Jui Chang; Po-Hsiu Kuo; Chih-Hsing Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Compression Fractures and Partial Phenotype Rescue With a Low Phosphorus Diet in the Chihuahua Zebrafish Osteogenesis Imperfecta Model.

Authors:  Silvia Cotti; Ann Huysseune; Daria Larionova; Wolfgang Koppe; Antonella Forlino; Paul Eckhard Witten
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Comparison of bone mineral density and vertebral fracture assessment in postmenopausal women with and without distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Tanawat Amphansap; Chayaphong Rattanaphonglekha; Jaruwat Vechasilp; Nitirat Stitkitti; Kamonchalat Apiromyanont; Atiporn Therdyothin
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2021-12-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.