Literature DB >> 17604127

Assessing auditory capabilities in young children.

Laurie S Eisenberg1, Amy S Martinez, Arthur Boothroyd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early detection of hearing loss in infants and toddlers has created a need for age-appropriate tests that assess auditory perceptual capabilities. This article describes a progressive test battery we have developed to evaluate phonetic contrast perception, phoneme recognition, and word recognition in children 6 months to 5 years. This battery is part of a clinical research protocol designed to track auditory development in this population.
METHODS: The progressive test battery originated from a model of auditory perceptual development to assess phonetic discrimination and word recognition. Phonetic discrimination is evaluated using the Battery of Auditory Speech Perception Tests for Infants and Toddlers (BATIT). The BATIT is composed of four measures (VRASPAC, PLAYSPAC, OLIMSPAC, and VIDSPAC) intended to assess the child's ability to distinguish between phonologically significant contrasts using developmentally appropriate tasks. Designed for children aged 6 months and up, performance is represented either by percent correct or by the level of confidence that the child's responses are not random. Phoneme and word recognition are assessed in children 4 years and older using lists of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) phonemes in words and lexically controlled words both in and out of sentence context (LEXSEN).
RESULTS: Cross-sectional data show that children with normal hearing may be assessed by the age of 7 months on VRASPAC; by 3 years on PLAYSPAC and OLIMSPAC; and by 4-5 years on VIDSPAC, CVC phonemes in words, and LEXSEN words in isolation and in sentences. Data from infants with hearing loss show that VRASPAC is sensitive to degree of hearing loss, but performance with normally hearing children declines after 12 months of age.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of phonetic discrimination and word recognition is, for the most part, attainable in young children using a progressive test battery, but none of the tests used here is effective between 1 and 3 years of age. Continued development will be required to fill this gap and to separate auditory from non-auditory influences on performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604127      PMCID: PMC1955768          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  18 in total

1.  Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude.

Authors:  B A Martin; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; A E Geers
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

4.  Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children.

Authors:  S Zimmerman-Phillips; A M Robbins; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

5.  Evaluation of the Computer-assisted Speech Perception Assessment Test (CASPA).

Authors:  C L Mackersie; A Boothroyd; D Minniear
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope.

Authors:  B A Martin; A Boothroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable.

Authors:  J M Ostroff; B A Martin; A Boothroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing.

Authors:  M P Moeller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss.

Authors:  C Yoshinaga-Itano; A L Sedey; D K Coulter; A L Mehl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  A modification of play audiometry to assess speech discrimination ability in severe-profoundly deaf 2- to 4-year-old children.

Authors:  P W Dawson; P E Nott; G M Clark; R S Cowan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  20 in total

1.  Studies in pediatric hearing loss at the House Research Institute.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen C Johnson; Amy S Martinez; Leslie Visser-Dumont; Dianne Hammes Ganguly; Jennifer F Still
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Assessing toddlers' speech-sound discrimination.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Kaylah Lalonde
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christopher G Clinard; Seeyoun Kwon; Vasant K Dasika; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Kelly L Tremblay; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-27

5.  An on-line imitative test of speech-pattern contrast perception (OlimSpac): developmental effects in normally hearing children.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd; Laurie S Eisenberg; Amy S Martinez
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Phonological awareness and print knowledge of preschool children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Sophie E Ambrose; Marc E Fey; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Infant cortical electrophysiology and perception of vowel contrasts.

Authors:  Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Relationships between speech perception abilities and spoken language skills in young children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Jean L Desjardin; Sophie E Ambrose; Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Evaluating the prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Pamela Dalton; Julie A Mennella; Beverly J Cowart; Christopher Maute; Edmund A Pribitkin; James S Reilly
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Assessing speech pattern contrast perception in infants: early results on VRASPAC.

Authors:  Amy Martinez; Laurie Eisenberg; Arthur Boothroyd; Leslie Visser-Dumont
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.