Literature DB >> 17602216

Attentional selection and identification of visual objects are reflected by distinct electrophysiological responses.

Veronica Mazza1, Massimo Turatto, Carlo Umiltà, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

Lateralised ERP responses were measured over posterior visual brain regions in response to visual search arrays that contained one colour singleton. In the localisation task, responses were determined by the visual hemifield where this singleton was presented. In the discrimination task, they were determined by the singletons' shape. While an N2pc component was elicited in an identical fashion in both tasks, a subsequent sustained contralateral negativity was consistently present at posterior sites in the discrimination task only. This dissociation demonstrates that these two activations reflect distinct visual processing stages. We suggest that while the N2pc reflects the ability of the visual system both to identify and localise a relevant stimulus in the scene, the late sustained activity reflects the subsequent in-depth analysis and identification of these stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17602216      PMCID: PMC2258005          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1002-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search.

Authors:  M Turatto; G Galfano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.

Authors:  M J Bravo; K Nakayama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

4.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

Review 5.  The binding problem.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG.

Authors:  E Wascher; B Wauschkuhn
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08

7.  Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; T F Münte
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-08

8.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  28 in total

1.  Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The success of the representation maintenance affects the memory-guided search processing: an ERP study.

Authors:  Min Wang; Ping Yang; Zhenlan Jin; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention--evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Markus F Neumann; Albert End; Stefanie Luttmann; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Early information processing contributions to object individuation revealed by perception of illusory figures.

Authors:  Claire K Naughtin; Jason B Mattingley; Paul E Dux
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search?

Authors:  Ellen Seiss; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  An electrophysiological measure of access to representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Clare Press; Disa Sauter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Electrophysiological measurement of information flow during visual search.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Jason T Arita; Julianna D Ianni; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.