STUDY OBJECTIVE: We prospectively examine whether provider posture (seated versus standing) influences patient and provider estimates of time spent at the bedside relative to actual time and patient perceptions of the provider-patient interaction. METHODS: A convenience sample of consenting adult patients presenting to an academic tertiary care emergency department between September 7, 2005, and September 25, 2005, were eligible for inclusion in this randomized, controlled trial. Providers (emergency medicine attending physicians, residents, physician assistants, and medical students) were randomly assigned to sit or stand during the initial encounter, after which, participants completed questionnaires about their perceptions of provider-patient interactions and time spent therein. Actual encounter length was measured. Data were analyzed to determine whether patient and provider perception differences existed, using a multilevel regression model that was adjusted for patient-level and provider-level covariates. RESULTS:Two hundred twenty-four consenting patients met inclusion criteria (239 approached; 15 excluded). Data from 36 providers were collected. The mean length of encounters in both study arms was 8.6 minutes (SD 4.8; range 1.5 to 34.1). Patients involved in seated interactions overestimated time providers spent performing initial encounters by an average of 1.3 minutes (SD 4.3 minutes), whereas patients involved in the standing interactions underestimated time by an average of 0.6 minutes (SD 4.3 minutes) (P=.001). Conversely, providers overestimated time spent with patients in both study arms (P=.85; mean [SD] 0.5 [3.6] versus 0.3 [3.2] minutes). Patient perceptions of the quality of patient-provider interactions were not affected by provider posture. CONCLUSION: Although provider posture during the initial interaction affects patient perceptions of time spent at the bedside, it does not influence patient perception of the provider's bedside manner, sense of caring, or understanding of the patient's problem.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We prospectively examine whether provider posture (seated versus standing) influences patient and provider estimates of time spent at the bedside relative to actual time and patient perceptions of the provider-patient interaction. METHODS: A convenience sample of consenting adult patients presenting to an academic tertiary care emergency department between September 7, 2005, and September 25, 2005, were eligible for inclusion in this randomized, controlled trial. Providers (emergency medicine attending physicians, residents, physician assistants, and medical students) were randomly assigned to sit or stand during the initial encounter, after which, participants completed questionnaires about their perceptions of provider-patient interactions and time spent therein. Actual encounter length was measured. Data were analyzed to determine whether patient and provider perception differences existed, using a multilevel regression model that was adjusted for patient-level and provider-level covariates. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-four consenting patients met inclusion criteria (239 approached; 15 excluded). Data from 36 providers were collected. The mean length of encounters in both study arms was 8.6 minutes (SD 4.8; range 1.5 to 34.1). Patients involved in seated interactions overestimated time providers spent performing initial encounters by an average of 1.3 minutes (SD 4.3 minutes), whereas patients involved in the standing interactions underestimated time by an average of 0.6 minutes (SD 4.3 minutes) (P=.001). Conversely, providers overestimated time spent with patients in both study arms (P=.85; mean [SD] 0.5 [3.6] versus 0.3 [3.2] minutes). Patient perceptions of the quality of patient-provider interactions were not affected by provider posture. CONCLUSION: Although provider posture during the initial interaction affects patient perceptions of time spent at the bedside, it does not influence patient perception of the provider's bedside manner, sense of caring, or understanding of the patient's problem.
Authors: Victoria Wilkins; Marc N Elliott; Andrea Richardson; Paula Lozano; Rita Mangione-Smith Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Marie C Haverfield; Aaron Tierney; Rachel Schwartz; Michelle B Bass; Cati Brown-Johnson; Dani L Zionts; Nadia Safaeinili; Meredith Fischer; Jonathan G Shaw; Sonoo Thadaney; Gabriella Piccininni; Karl A Lorenz; Steven M Asch; Abraham Verghese; Donna M Zulman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrea Mechanick Braverman; Elisabeth J Kunkel; Leo Katz; Austin Katona; Teresa Heavens; Andrew Miller; Jennifer Jasmine Arfaa Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2015-05-01
Authors: Blair P Golden; Sean Tackett; Kimiyoshi Kobayashi; Terry Nelson; Alison Agrawal; Nicole Pritchett; Kaley Tilton; Geron Mills; Ting-Jia Lorigiano; Meron Hirpa; Jessica Lin; Sarah Disney; Matt Lautzenheiser; Shanshan Huang; Stephen A Berry Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 6.473