Literature DB >> 35170583

Content and Actionability of Recommendations to Providers After Shadow Coaching.

Denise D Quigley1, Nabeel Qureshi, Alina Palimaru, Chau Pham, Ron D Hays.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health care organizations track patient experience data, identify areas of improvement, monitor provider performance, and assist providers in improving their interactions with patients. Some practices use one-on-one provider counseling ("shadow coaching") to identify and modify provider behaviors. A recent evaluation of a large shadow coaching program found statistically significant improvements in coached providers' patient experience scores immediately after being coached. This study aimed to examine the content of the recommendations given to those providers aimed at improving provider-patient interactions, characterize these recommendations, and examine their actionability.
METHODS: Providers at a large, urban federally qualified health center were selected for coaching based on Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) patient experience scores (92 of 320 providers), shadowed by a trained peer coach for a half to full day and received recommendations on how to improve interactions with their patients. We coded 1082 recommendations found in the 92 coaching reports.
RESULTS: Reports contained an average of 12 recommendations. About half encouraged consistency of existing behaviors and half encouraged new behaviors. Most recommendations related to behaviors of the provider rather than support staff and targeted actions within the examination room rather than other spaces (eg, waiting room). The most common recommendations mapped to behavioral aspects of provider communication. Most recommendations targeted verbal rather than nonverbal communication behaviors. Most recommendations were actionable (ie, specific, descriptive), with recommendations that encouraged new behaviors being more actionable than those that encouraged existing actions.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient experience surveys are effective at identifying where improvement is needed but are not always informative enough to instruct providers on how to modify and improve their interactions with patients. Analyzing the feedback given to coached providers as part of an effective shadow-coaching program provides details about implementation on shadow-coaching feedback. Recommendations to providers aimed at improving their interactions with patients need to not only suggest the exact behaviors defined within patient experience survey items but also include recommended behaviors indirectly associated with those measured behaviors. Attention needs to be paid to supplementing patient experience data with explicit, tangible, and descriptive (ie, actionable) recommendations associated with the targeted, measured behaviors. Research is needed to understand how recommendations are put into practice by providers and what motivates and supports them to sustain changed behaviors.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35170583      PMCID: PMC9376188          DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   1.147


  61 in total

1.  Leading a multigenerational nursing workforce: issues, challenges and strategies.

Authors:  Rose O Sherman
Journal:  Online J Issues Nurs       Date:  2006-05-31

Review 2.  Peer-coaching with health care professionals: what is the current status of the literature and what are the key components necessary in peer-coaching? A scoping review.

Authors:  Heidi Schwellnus; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Patient Experience: The New Heart of Healthcare Leadership.

Authors:  Jason A Wolf
Journal:  Front Health Serv Manage       Date:  2017 Spring

4.  What Words Convey: The Potential for Patient Narratives to Inform Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Rachel Grob; Mark Schlesinger; Lacey Rose Barre; Naomi Bardach; Tara Lagu; Dale Shaller; Andrew M Parker; Steven C Martino; Melissa L Finucane; Jennifer L Cerully; Alina Palimaru
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Use of CAHPS patient experience surveys to assess the impact of health care innovations.

Authors:  Robin M Weinick; Denise D Quigley; Lauren A Mayer; Clarissa D Sellers
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2014-09

6.  Analysis & commentary. Measuring patient experience as a strategy for improving primary care.

Authors:  Katherine Browne; Deborah Roseman; Dale Shaller; Susan Edgman-Levitan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Increasing the Registered Nursing Workforce Through a Second-Degree BSN Program Coaching Model.

Authors:  Tiffani Wise; Bibha Gautam; Rebbecca Harris; Deborah Casida; Rachel Chapman; Lori Hammond
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.082

8.  Examining the Business Case for Patient Experience: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Denise D Quigley; Kerry Reynolds; Stephanie Dellva; Rebecca Anhang Price
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01

9.  Physician groups' use of data from patient experience surveys.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Gillian K SteelFisher; Melinda Karp; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  CAHPS and Comments: How Closed-Ended Survey Questions and Narrative Accounts Interact in the Assessment of Patient Experience.

Authors:  Steven C Martino; Dale Shaller; Mark Schlesinger; Andrew M Parker; Lise Rybowski; Rachel Grob; Jennifer L Cerully; Melissa L Finucane
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2017-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.