Literature DB >> 31919725

Can Patient-Provider Interpersonal Interventions Achieve the Quadruple Aim of Healthcare? A Systematic Review.

Marie C Haverfield1,2, Aaron Tierney3, Rachel Schwartz4,5, Michelle B Bass6, Cati Brown-Johnson7, Dani L Zionts7, Nadia Safaeinili7, Meredith Fischer7, Jonathan G Shaw7, Sonoo Thadaney3, Gabriella Piccininni3, Karl A Lorenz4,7, Steven M Asch4,7, Abraham Verghese3, Donna M Zulman4,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human connection is at the heart of medical care, but questions remain as to the effectiveness of interpersonal interventions. The purpose of this review was to characterize the associations between patient-provider interpersonal interventions and the quadruple aim outcomes (population health, patient experience, cost, and provider experience).
METHODS: We sourced data from PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycInfo (January 1997-August 2017). Selected studies included randomized controlled trials and controlled observational studies that examined the association between patient-provider interpersonal interventions and at least one outcome measure of the quadruple aim. Two abstractors independently extracted information about study design, methods, and quality. We characterized evidence related to the objective of the intervention, type and duration of intervention training, target recipient (provider-only vs. provider-patient dyad), and quadruple aim outcomes.
RESULTS: Seventy-three out of 21,835 studies met the design and outcome inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of research was moderate to high for most included studies; 67% of interventions targeted the provider. Most studies measured impact on patient experience; improvements in experience (e.g., satisfaction, patient-centeredness, reduced unmet needs) often corresponded with a positive impact on other patient health outcomes (e.g., quality of life, depression, adherence). Enhanced interpersonal interactions improved provider well-being, burnout, stress, and confidence in communicating with difficult patients. Roughly a quarter of studies evaluated cost, but the majority reported no significant differences between intervention and control groups. Among studies that measured time in the clinical encounter, intervention effects varied. Interventions with lower demands on provider time and effort were often as effective as those with higher demands. DISCUSSION: Simple, low-demand patient-provider interpersonal interventions may have the potential to improve patient health and patient and provider experience, but there is limited evidence that these interventions influence cost-related outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interpersonal interventions; patient–provider communication; quadruple aim; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31919725      PMCID: PMC7351919          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05525-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  92 in total

1.  Effectiveness of motivational interviewing to improve therapeutic adherence in patients over 65 years old with chronic diseases: A cluster randomized clinical trial in primary care.

Authors:  Roger Ruiz Moral; Luis Angel Pérula de Torres; Laura Pulido Ortega; Margarita Criado Larumbe; Ana Roldán Villalobos; Jose Angel Fernández García; Juan Manuel Parras Rejano
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-03-18

2.  Effectiveness of communication skills training of nurses on the quality of life and satisfaction with healthcare professionals among newly diagnosed cancer patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sakiko Fukui; Keiko Ogawa; Akemi Yamagishi
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  The effect of educational intervention on intercultural communication: results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hans Harmsen; Roos Bernsen; Ludwien Meeuwesen; Siep Thomas; Govert Dorrenboom; David Pinto; Marc Bruijnzeels
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. A randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  R C Smith; J S Lyles; J Mettler; B E Stoffelmayr; L F Van Egeren; A A Marshall; J C Gardiner; K M Maduschke; J M Stanley; G G Osborn; V Shebroe; R B Greenbaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Effect of patient completed agenda forms and doctors' education about the agenda on the outcome of consultations: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J F Middleton; R K McKinley; C L Gillies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-17

6.  Communication training and antibiotic use in acute respiratory tract infections. A cluster randomised controlled trial in general practice.

Authors:  Matthias Briel; Wolf Langewitz; Peter Tschudi; Jim Young; Christa Hugenschmidt; Heiner C Bucher
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  The effect of the BATHE interview technique on the empowerment of diabetic patients in primary care: A cluster randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Selçuk Akturan; Çiğdem Apaydın Kaya; Pemra Cöbek Ünalan; Mehmet Akman
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; A Woodcock; S Griffin; N Spiegal; M J Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

9.  Successful GP intervention with frequent attenders in primary care: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Juan Angel Bellón; Antonina Rodríguez-Bayón; Juan de Dios Luna; Francisco Torres-González
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  A cluster-randomised trial evaluating an intervention for patients with stress-related mental disorders and sick leave in primary care.

Authors:  Ingrid M Bakker; Berend Terluin; Harm W J van Marwijk; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Frank Rijmen; Willem van Mechelen; Wim A B Stalman
Journal:  PLoS Clin Trials       Date:  2007-06-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Primary care experiences of veterans with opioid use disorder in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Audrey L Jones; Stefan G Kertesz; Leslie R M Hausmann; Maria K Mor; Ying Suo; Warren B P Pettey; James H Schaefer; Adi V Gundlapalli; Adam J Gordon
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-02-29

2.  Advancing Evidence Synthesis from Effectiveness to Implementation: Integration of Implementation Measures into Evidence Reviews.

Authors:  Aaron A Tierney; Marie C Haverfield; Mark P McGovern; Donna M Zulman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Strategies to Improve Clinician-Patient Communication Experiences for Patients With Neurologic Conditions.

Authors:  Melissa J Armstrong; Neal J Weisbrod; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-12

4.  Patient Sense of Belonging in the Veterans Health Administration: A Qualitative Study of Appointment Attendance and Patient Engagement.

Authors:  Megan Lafferty; Wynn Strange; Peter Kaboli; Anaïs Tuepker; Alan R Teo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.178

Review 5.  Approach to Human-Centered, Evidence-Driven Adaptive Design (AHEAD) for Health Care Interventions: a Proposed Framework.

Authors:  Meredith Fischer; Nadia Safaeinili; Marie C Haverfield; Cati G Brown-Johnson; Dani Zionts; Donna M Zulman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Healing Through History: a qualitative evaluation of a social medicine consultation curriculum for internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Joel Bradley; David Styren; Abigail LaPlante; John Howe; Sienna R Craig; Emily Cohen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Patient and primary care perspectives on hypertension management: short report of a qualitative study in a tribal health system.

Authors:  Krista R Schaefer; Michael R Todd; Susan Brown Trinidad; Renee F Robinson; Denise A Dillard
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.228

8.  Exploring Nurse and Patient Experiences of Developing Rapport During Oncology Ambulatory Care Videoconferencing Visits: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Paula D Koppel; Jennie C De Gagne; Sharron Docherty; Sophia Smith; Neil S Prose; Terri Jabaley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 7.076

9.  Radiation Oncologist Perceptions of Telemedicine from Consultation to Treatment Planning: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Helen Zhang; Elaine E Cha; Kathleen Lynch; Oren Cahlon; Daniel R Gomez; Narek Shaverdian; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.