Literature DB >> 17594798

The proximity of visual landmarks impacts reaching performance.

Olav Krigolson1, Nick Clark, Matthew Heath, Gord Binsted.   

Abstract

The control of goal-directed reaching movements is thought to rely upon egocentric visual information derived from the visuomotor networks of the dorsal visual pathway. However, recent research (Krigolson and Heath, 2004) suggests it is also possible to make allocentric comparisons between a visual background and a target object to facilitate reaching accuracy. Here we sought to determine if the effectiveness of these allocentric comparisons is reduced as distance between a visual background and a target object increases. To accomplish this, participants completed memory-guided reaching movements to targets presented in an otherwise empty visual background or positioned within a proximal, medial, or distal visual background. Our results indicated that the availability of a proximal or medial visual background reduced endpoint variability relative to reaches made without a visual background. Interestingly, we found that endpoint variability was not reduced when participants reached to targets framed within a distal visual background. Such findings suggest that allocentric visual information is used to facilitate reaching performance; however, the fidelity by which such cues are used appears linked to the proximity of veridical target location. Importantly, these data also suggest that information from both the dorsal and ventral visual streams can be integrated to facilitate the online control of reaching movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17594798     DOI: 10.1163/156856807780919028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  15 in total

1.  Antisaccades exhibit diminished online control relative to prosaccades.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Katie Dunham; Gordon Binsted; Bryan Godbolt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vector inversion diminishes the online control of antisaccades.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jeffrey Weiler; Kendall Marriott; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Goal-directed reaching: movement strategies influence the weighting of allocentric and egocentric visual cues.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Ayla Tessmer; Gordon Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Kristina A Neely; Jason Yakimishyn; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Distinct and flexible rates of online control.

Authors:  John de Grosbois; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Attentional load interferes with target localization across saccades.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Jillian Chan; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dissociable effects of irrelevant context on 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  No effect of delay on the spatial representation of serial reach targets.

Authors:  Immo Schütz; Denise Y P Henriques; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.