Literature DB >> 17593495

Differences in age-related bone mass of proximal femur between Chinese women and different ethnic women in the United States.

Yan-Li Hou1, Xian-Ping Wu, Xiang-Hang Luo, Hong Zhang, Xing-Zhi Cao, Y-B Jiang, Er-Yuan Liao.   

Abstract

Substantial racial differences in bone mass and bone loss rate have been reported, but the extent of the difference between native Chinese women and women of different races in the United States is not clear. We used a DXA bone densitometer to measure bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), bone area (BA), and volumetric BMD (vBMD) in different regions of the proximal femur in 3614 Chinese women aged 20 years and older. Regression models were chosen to best fit the changes of these parameters with increasing age. The values in their fitted curves were determined by the Cartesian coordinate numeration system. Subsequently, we compared these fitted curves to full-matched data of non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic white, and Mexican American women reported by the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). We found that all fitted curves of bone mass of non-Hispanic black women were significantly higher than those of Chinese, non-Hispanic white, and Mexican American women (P = 0.000). The BMD and BMC fitted curves in various regions of the hip for non-Hispanic blacks were 22%-28% and 26%-43% higher than those for Chinese women, 8.3%-13% and 7.9%-9.5% higher than those for non-Hispanic whites, and 8.8%-10% and 13%-19% higher than those for Mexican Americans, respectively. However, when the expression of difference was transformed from BMD to vBMD at the femoral neck, the difference between Chinese and non-Hispanic black women was reduced from 22% to 18% and that between Chinese and non-Hispanic white women from 7.4% to 0.8%, but the difference increased from 3.2% to 9.6% between non-Hispanic white and Mexican American women and from 13% to 17% between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black women. By the age of 80 years, the accumulated bone loss rate in various regions of the proximal femur for Chinese, Mexican Americans, non-Hispanic whites, and non-Hispanic blacks were -38.9% +/- 1.8%, -34.4% +/- 3.1%, -27.8% +/- 5.9%, and -28.4% +/- 4.8%, respectively. In conclusion, bone mass in the proximal femur of native Chinese women is significantly lower, and the bone loss rate greater, than those of non-Asian women in the United States. At the femoral neck, the vBMD of Chinese women is similar to that of non-Hispanic white women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17593495     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-007-0756-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.976


  48 in total

1.  Changes in bone mineral, lean body mass and fat content as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  M K Karlsson; K J Obrant; B E Nilsson; O Johnell
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS).

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; F Bertoldo; G Bianchi; C Cepollaro; A Del Puente; S Giannini; S Gonnelli; D Maggio; C Marcocci; S Minisola; E Palummeri; M Rossini; L Sartori; L Sinigaglia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Epidemiology of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in 1996 in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

Authors:  K Y Huang; J K Chang; S Y Ling; N Endo; H E Takahashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Risk factors for increased bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  H Burger; C E de Laet; P L van Daele; A E Weel; J C Witteman; A Hofman; H A Pols
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Effect of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density of female junior tennis players.

Authors:  H Haapasalo; P Kannus; H Sievänen; M Pasanen; K Uusi-Rasi; A Heinonen; P Oja; I Vuori
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size.

Authors:  G S Bhudhikanok; M C Wang; K Eckert; C Matkin; R Marcus; L K Bachrach
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Prevention of falls in the elderly.

Authors:  A H Myers; Y Young; J A Langlois
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Study of bone mineral density in lumbar spine and femoral neck in a Spanish population. Multicentre Research Project on Osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Diaz Curiel; J L Carrasco de la Peña; J Honorato Perez; R Perez Cano; A Rapado; I Ruiz Martinez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, bone turnover, and rates of bone loss in older African-American women.

Authors:  J M Zmuda; J A Cauley; M E Danielson; R L Wolf; R E Ferrell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  A comparison study of the reference curves of bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women.

Authors:  X P Wu; E Y Liao; G Huang; R C Dai; H Zhang
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  9 in total

1.  Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image.

Authors:  C M Langton; S Pisharody; J H Keyak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Premenopausal and postmenopausal differences in bone microstructure and mechanical competence in Chinese-American and white women.

Authors:  Marcella D Walker; X Sherry Liu; Bin Zhou; Shivani Agarwal; George Liu; Donald J McMahon; John P Bilezikian; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Epidemiology and structural basis of racial differences in fragility fractures in Chinese and Caucasians.

Authors:  X-F Wang; E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Prevalence of fracture and osteoporosis risk factors in American Indian and Alaska Native people.

Authors:  Tracy Frech; Khe-ni Ma; Elizabeth D Ferrucci; Anne P Lanier; Molly McFadden; Lillian Tom-Orme; Martha L Slattery; Maureen A Murtaugh
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

5.  Bone health in immigrant Hispanic women living in Texas.

Authors:  Joyce E Ballard; Cheryl M Cooper; Mary A Bone; Guillermo Saade; David B Holiday
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-10

6.  Risks factors for low bone mineral density in pre-menopausal Mexican women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Claudia Mendoza-Pinto; Mario García-Carrasco; Hilda Sandoval-Cruz; Ricardo O Escárcega; Mario Jiménez-Hernández; Ivet Etchegaray-Morales; Elena Soto-Vega; Margarita Muñoz-Guarneros; Aurelio López-Colombo; Margarita Delezé-Hinojosa; Ricard Cervera
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Bone mass in schoolchildren in Brazil: the effect of racial miscegenation, pubertal stage, and socioeconomic differences.

Authors:  Roberto Regis Ribeiro; Gil Guerra-Junior; Antonio de Azevedo Barros-Filho
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; David A Hanley; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Higher body mass, older age and higher monounsaturated fatty acids intake reflect better quantitative ultrasound parameters in Inuit preschoolers.

Authors:  Jessy El Hayek; Grace Egeland; Hope Weiler
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 1.228

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.