Literature DB >> 14595167

Correlation of patient satisfaction with symptom severity and walking ability after surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Kazuo Yamashita1, Junzo Hayashi, Kenji Ohzono, Kazuo Hiroshima.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective follow-up of 83 patients who had decompressive laminotomy with or without fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis between September 1992 and September 1998.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of the correlation between patient satisfaction and both the severity of postoperative symptoms and walking ability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In clinical studies of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, patient satisfaction often is an item in the outcome questionnaire. However, little is known about the relationship of patient satisfaction to postoperative symptoms or functioning.
METHODS: Patients completed standardized preoperative and follow-up questionnaires about symptom severity, walking ability, and their satisfaction with the results of surgical treatment. The significance of the correlation of patient satisfaction with the severity of postoperative symptoms and walking ability was evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean length of follow-up was 39 months (range 12-84 months). The final questionnaire of a series was answered by 77 patients (93% of the cohort). By univariate analysis, the correlations of patient satisfaction with postoperative back pain, leg pain, numbness, subjective difficulty in walking, and walking ability were statistically significant (Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient: 0.58, 0.57, 0.53, 0.64, and 0.43, respectively). Postoperative walking ability was a weaker correlate of patient satisfaction than the severity of postoperative symptoms. By multivariate regression analysis, the only independent correlate was subjective difficulty in walking.
CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of patient satisfaction as an outcome in patients operated on for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, we should keep in mind that postoperative functioning is a weak correlate of satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14595167     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090888.63860.4F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Peng; Long Chen; Jing Peng; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

2.  Trends in Pain Medication Prescriptions and Satisfaction Scores in Spine Surgery Patients at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Erik Wang; Dennis Vasquez-Montes; Deeptee Jain; Lorraine H Hutzler; Joseph A Bosco; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Aaron J Buckland; Charla R Fischer
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Christy C Tomkins-Lane; Sara Christensen Holz; Karen S Yamakawa; Vaishali V Phalke; Doug J Quint; Jennifer Miner; Andrew J Haig
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 4.  What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Kent Stuber; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Michael Schneider; Y Raja Rampersaud; Andrea D Furlan; Carol A Kennedy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does the duration of symptoms in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis affect outcomes?: analysis of the Spine Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  Kristen E Radcliff; Jeff Rihn; Alan Hilibrand; Timothy DiIorio; Tor Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Walking assessment in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: capacity, performance, and self-report measures.

Authors:  Justin Conway; Christy C Tomkins; Andrew J Haig
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Determinants of patient satisfaction after surgery for central spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis: a register study of 5100 patients.

Authors:  Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson; Bo Jönsson; Björn Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Do patient expectations of spinal surgery relate to functional outcome?

Authors:  Albert Yee; Nana Adjei; Jennifer Do; Michael Ford; Joel Finkelstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Raymond Denzler; Jiri Dvorak; Markus Müntener; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in adult spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Ching-Hsiao Yu; Chen-Ti Wang; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.