Literature DB >> 26864764

Arm posture-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability are largely spinal in origin.

James L Nuzzo1, Gabriel S Trajano2, Benjamin K Barry1, Simon C Gandevia3, Janet L Taylor4.   

Abstract

Biceps brachii motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from cortical stimulation are influenced by arm posture. We used subcortical stimulation of corticospinal axons to determine whether this postural effect is spinal in origin. While seated at rest, 12 subjects assumed several static arm postures, which varied in upper-arm (shoulder flexed, shoulder abducted, arm hanging to side) and forearm orientation (pronated, neutral, supinated). Transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralateral motor cortex elicited MEPs in resting biceps and triceps brachii, and electrical stimulation of corticospinal tract axons at the cervicomedullary junction elicited cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs). MEPs and CMEPs were normalized to the maximal compound muscle action potential (Mmax). Responses in biceps were influenced by upper-arm and forearm orientation. For upper-arm orientation, biceps CMEPs were 68% smaller (P= 0.001), and biceps MEPs 31% smaller (P= 0.012), with the arm hanging to the side compared with when the shoulder was flexed. For forearm orientation, both biceps CMEPs and MEPs were 34% smaller (both P< 0.046) in pronation compared with supination. Responses in triceps were influenced by upper-arm, but not forearm, orientation. Triceps CMEPs were 46% smaller (P= 0.007) with the arm hanging to the side compared with when the shoulder was flexed. Triceps MEPs and biceps and triceps MEP/CMEP ratios were unaffected by arm posture. The novel finding is that arm posture-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability in humans are largely spinal in origin. An interplay of multiple reflex inputs to motoneurons likely explains the results.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biceps brachii; cervicomedullary motor evoked potential; motoneuron; motor cortex; spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26864764      PMCID: PMC4869508          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00885.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  Inhibitory projections from pronator teres to biceps brachii motoneurones in human.

Authors:  A Naito; M Shindo; T Miyasaka; Y J Sun; H Momoi; M Chishima
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inhibitory projection from brachioradialis to biceps brachii motoneurones in human.

Authors:  A Naito; M Shindo; T Miyasaka; Y J Sun; H Morita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Peripheral effects on the amplitude of monopolar and bipolar H-reflex potentials from the soleus muscle.

Authors:  L Gerilovsky; P Tsvetinov; G Trenkova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Is presynaptic inhibition distributed to corticospinal fibres in man?

Authors:  J Nielsen; N Petersen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Pattern of cutaneous inhibition of the propriospinal-like excitation to human upper limb motoneurones.

Authors:  J Nielsen; E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; A Oliviero; P Profice; L Ferrara; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  On the mechanism of the post-activation depression of the H-reflex in human subjects.

Authors:  H Hultborn; M Illert; J Nielsen; A Paul; M Ballegaard; H Wiese
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Muscle spindle activity in man during shortening and lengthening contractions.

Authors:  D Burke; K E Hagbarth; L Löfstedt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Facilitatory effect of tonic voluntary contraction on responses to motor cortex stimulation.

Authors:  Y Ugawa; Y Terao; R Hanajima; K Sakai; I Kanazawa
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-12
View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of movement-related pain on behaviour and corticospinal excitability changes associated with arm movement preparation.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Nicolas Mavromatis; Martin Gagné; Laurent J Bouyer; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Posture interacts with arm weight support to modulate corticomotor excitability to the upper limb.

Authors:  Keith D Runnalls; Greg Anson; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Daniel Abdel-Malek; Christopher M F Bunce; Michael W R Holmes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of acute resistance training modality on corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical and neuromuscular responses.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Wei-Peng Teo; Dale Harris; Brendan Major; Dan VanderWesthuizen; Ashlee M Hendy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The effects of forearm position and contraction intensity on cortical and spinal excitability during a submaximal force steadiness task of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Alexandra F Yacyshyn; Samantha Kuzyk; Jennifer M Jakobi; Chris J McNeil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Longing for a Longitudinal Proxy: Acutely Measured Surface EMG Amplitude is not a Validated Predictor of Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Israel Halperin; Gabriel S Trajano; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Shoulder position and handedness differentially affect excitability and intracortical inhibition of hand muscles.

Authors:  Shashwati Geed; Megan Grainger; Michelle L Harris-Love; Peter S Lum; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Corticomotor excitability of gluteus maximus and hip extensor strength: The influence of sex.

Authors:  Yo Shih; Beth E Fisher; Jason J Kutch; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 2.397

9.  Changes in Corticospinal and Spinal Excitability to the Biceps Brachii with a Neutral vs. Pronated Handgrip Position Differ between Arm Cycling and Tonic Elbow Flexion.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Mark Richards; Garrick N Forman; Michael W R Holmes; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Phase- and Workload-Dependent Changes in Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps and Triceps Brachii during Arm Cycling.

Authors:  Alyssa-Joy Spence; Lynsey R Alcock; Evan J Lockyer; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2016-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.