Sue D Pedersen1, Jian Kang, Gregory A Kline. 1. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, 1441 29th St NW, North Tower, Room 302, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4J8. sue.pedersen@calgaryhealthregion.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Portion size is an important determinant of energy intake. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial has evaluated the efficacy of portion control tools to induce weight loss. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, weight reduction improves glycemic control. METHODS: We randomly assigned 130 obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (including 55 patientstaking insulin) to the daily use of a commercially available portion control plate for 6 months (intervention group) vs to usual care in the form of dietary teaching (usual care control group). RESULTS: Follow-up was 93.8%. Patients in the intervention group lost significantly more weight than control subjects (mean+/-SD, 1.8%+/-3.9% vs 0.1%+/-3.0%, P=.006). Compared with controls, more patients in the intervention group required a decrease in their diabetes medications at 6 months (26.2% vs 10.8%, P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with usual care, the portion control tool studied was effective in inducing weight loss. The portion control plate also enabled patients with diabetes mellitus to decrease their hypoglycemic medications without sacrificing glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00254124.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Portion size is an important determinant of energy intake. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial has evaluated the efficacy of portion control tools to induce weight loss. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, weight reduction improves glycemic control. METHODS: We randomly assigned 130 obesepatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (including 55 patients taking insulin) to the daily use of a commercially available portion control plate for 6 months (intervention group) vs to usual care in the form of dietary teaching (usual care control group). RESULTS: Follow-up was 93.8%. Patients in the intervention group lost significantly more weight than control subjects (mean+/-SD, 1.8%+/-3.9% vs 0.1%+/-3.0%, P=.006). Compared with controls, more patients in the intervention group required a decrease in their diabetes medications at 6 months (26.2% vs 10.8%, P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with usual care, the portion control tool studied was effective in inducing weight loss. The portion control plate also enabled patients with diabetes mellitus to decrease their hypoglycemic medications without sacrificing glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00254124.
Authors: Aroub A Alnasser; Raja E Amalraj; Arjuna Sathiaseelan; Abdulrahman S Al-Khalifa; Debbi Marais Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Deborah J Toobert; Lisa A Strycker; Sarah E Hampson; Erika Westling; Steven M Christiansen; Thomas G Hurley; James R Hébert Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2011-10
Authors: Hee-Jung Ahn; Yu-Kyung Eom; Kyung-Ah Han; Hwi-Ryun Kwon; Hyun Jin Kim; Kang Seo Park; Kyung-Wan Min Journal: Korean Diabetes J Date: 2010-06-30
Authors: Shari D Bolen; Apoorva Chandar; Corinna Falck-Ytter; Carl Tyler; Adam T Perzynski; Alida M Gertz; Paulette Sage; Steven Lewis; Maurine Cobabe; Ying Ye; Michelle Menegay; Donna M Windish Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 5.128