Literature DB >> 17591985

Physiological properties of rod photoreceptor cells in green-sensitive cone pigment knock-in mice.

Keisuke Sakurai1, Akishi Onishi, Hiroo Imai, Osamu Chisaka, Yoshiki Ueda, Jiro Usukura, Kei Nakatani, Yoshinori Shichida.   

Abstract

Rod and cone photoreceptor cells that are responsible for scotopic and photopic vision, respectively, exhibit photoresponses different from each other and contain similar phototransduction proteins with distinctive molecular properties. To investigate the contribution of the different molecular properties of visual pigments to the responses of the photoreceptor cells, we have generated knock-in mice in which rod visual pigment (rhodopsin) was replaced with mouse green-sensitive cone visual pigment (mouse green). The mouse green was successfully transported to the rod outer segments, though the expression of mouse green in homozygous retina was approximately 11% of rhodopsin in wild-type retina. Single-cell recordings of wild-type and homozygous rods suggested that the flash sensitivity and the single-photon responses from mouse green were three to fourfold lower than those from rhodopsin after correction for the differences in cell volume and levels of several signal transduction proteins. Subsequent measurements using heterozygous rods expressing both mouse green and rhodopsin E122Q mutant, where these pigments in the same rod cells can be selectively irradiated due to their distinctive absorption maxima, clearly showed that the photoresponse of mouse green was threefold lower than that of rhodopsin. Noise analysis indicated that the rate of thermal activations of mouse green was 1.7 x 10(-7) s(-1), about 860-fold higher than that of rhodopsin. The increase in thermal activation of mouse green relative to that of rhodopsin results in only 4% reduction of rod photosensitivity for bright lights, but would instead be expected to severely affect the visual threshold under dim-light conditions. Therefore, the abilities of rhodopsin to generate a large single photon response and to retain high thermal stability in darkness are factors that have been necessary for the evolution of scotopic vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17591985      PMCID: PMC2154367          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200609729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  57 in total

1.  Membrane protein diffusion sets the speed of rod phototransduction.

Authors:  P D Calvert; V I Govardovskii; N Krasnoperova; R E Anderson; J Lem; C L Makino
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Role of visual pigment properties in rod and cone phototransduction.

Authors:  Vladimir Kefalov; Yingbin Fu; Nicholas Marsh-Armstrong; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The photosensitivities of visual pigments in the presence of hydroxylamine.

Authors:  H J Dartnall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Low retinal noise in animals with low body temperature allows high visual sensitivity.

Authors:  A C Aho; K Donner; C Hydén; L O Larsen; T Reuter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Amplification and kinetics of the activation steps in phototransduction.

Authors:  E N Pugh; T D Lamb
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1993-03-01

6.  Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  L D Carter-Dawson; M M LaVail
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1979-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Analysis of electrical noise in turtle cones.

Authors:  T D Lamb; E J Simon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The murine cone photoreceptor: a single cone type expresses both S and M opsins with retinal spatial patterning.

Authors:  M L Applebury; M P Antoch; L C Baxter; L L Chun; J D Falk; F Farhangfar; K Kage; M G Krzystolik; L A Lyass; J T Robbins
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Recoverin improves rod-mediated vision by enhancing signal transmission in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Alapakkam P Sampath; Katherine J Strissel; Rajesh Elias; Vadim Y Arshavsky; James F McGinnis; Jeannie Chen; Satoru Kawamura; Fred Rieke; James B Hurley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Is chicken green-sensitive cone visual pigment a rhodopsin-like pigment? A comparative study of the molecular properties between chicken green and rhodopsin.

Authors:  Y Shichida; H Imai; Y Imamoto; Y Fukada; T Yoshizawa
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-08-09       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  34 in total

1.  Role of guanylyl cyclase modulation in mouse cone phototransduction.

Authors:  Keisuke Sakurai; Jeannie Chen; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Rod and cone visual pigments and phototransduction through pharmacological, genetic, and physiological approaches.

Authors:  Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Speed, sensitivity, and stability of the light response in rod and cone photoreceptors: facts and models.

Authors:  Juan I Korenbrot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 4.  Lessons from photoreceptors: turning off g-protein signaling in living cells.

Authors:  Marie E Burns; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2010-04

5.  A kinetic analysis of mouse rod and cone photoreceptor responses.

Authors:  Jürgen Reingruber; Norianne T Ingram; Khris G Griffis; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  How vision begins: an odyssey.

Authors:  Dong-Gen Luo; Tian Xue; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  High cGMP synthetic activity in carp cones.

Authors:  Norihiko Takemoto; Shuji Tachibanaki; Satoru Kawamura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Evolution of opsins and phototransduction.

Authors:  Yoshinori Shichida; Take Matsuyama
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  The evolution of rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Ala Morshedian; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Photopigment quenching is Ca2+ dependent and controls response duration in salamander L-cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Hugh R Matthews; Alapakkam P Sampath
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.