Literature DB >> 17588821

The safety and efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft for posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis: minimum 4-year follow-up of a pilot study.

Alexander R Vaccaro1, Peter G Whang, Tushar Patel, Frank M Phillips, D Greg Anderson, Todd J Albert, Alan S Hilibrand, Richard S Brower, Mark F Kurd, Anoop Appannagari, Milan Patel, Jeffrey S Fischgrund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although autogenous bone is still considered to be the gold standard graft material for promoting spinal fusion, other bone graft substitutes have been developed in an attempt to improve arthrodesis rates and avoid the complications associated with the procurement of autograft. The bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) represent a family of osteoinductive growth factors that are known to stimulate the osteoblastic differentiation of stem cells. Osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) Putty is a commercially available BMP preparation that is already approved for use in humans. Previous clinical studies involving patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis have reported that the efficacy and safety of OP-1 Putty is comparable to that of autograft at both 1- and 2-year follow-up.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intermediate-term efficacy and safety of OP-1 Putty as an alternative to autogenous bone by comparing the 4-year radiographic, clinical, and safety data of these same patients who underwent decompression and uninstrumented fusion with either OP-1 Putty or iliac crest autograft. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical pilot study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty-six patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and single-level uninstrumented fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis and symptomatic spinal stenosis were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to receive either OP-1 Putty (24 patients) or autogenous iliac crest bone graft (12 patients). OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcome measures consisting of Oswestry Disability Index and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores were used to evaluate clinical efficacy. Perioperative data including operative time, estimated blood loss, and duration of hospital stay were also recorded for each surgery. Postoperatively, a neurological examination and an assessment of donor-site pain (if applicable) were performed at every follow-up visit. Radiographic fusion success was defined as the presence of continuous bridging bone formation between the transverse processes at the level of the spondylolisthesis with minimal motion evident on dynamic lateral x-ray films. The primary efficacy endpoint was the overall success rate, a composite measure derived from both radiographic and clinical parameters. The safety of OP-1 Putty was confirmed by comparing the nature and frequency of all adverse events and complications that were prospectively observed in either of the groups.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and symptoms of neurogenic claudication underwent decompressive laminectomy and single-level uninstrumented fusion with either OP-1 Putty or autograft. All patients were evaluated at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months, after which time they were instructed to return on a yearly basis. Multiple neuroradiologists blinded to the assigned treatment reviewed static and dynamic X-ray films with digital calipers to assess fusion status according to the presence of continuous bridging bone across the transverse processes as well as the amount of residual motion evident at the level of interest. Oswestry Disability Index surveys and SF-36 questionnaires were used to assess clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: At the 48-month time point, complete radiographic and clinical data were available for 22 of 36 patients (16 OP-1 Putty and 6 autograft) and 25 of 36 patients (18 OP-1 Putty and 7 autograft), respectively. Radiographic evidence of a solid arthrodesis was present in 11 of 16 OP-1 Putty patients (68.8%) and 3 of 6 autograft patients (50%). Clinically successful outcomes defined as at least a 20% improvement in preoperative Oswestry scores were experienced by 14 of 19 OP-1 Putty patients (73.7%) and 4 of 7 autograft patients (57.1%); these clinical findings were corroborated by similar increases in SF-36 scores. The respective overall success rates of the OP-1 Putty and autograft group were 62.5% and 33.3%. In this study, there were no incidents of local or systemic toxicity, ectopic bone production, or other adverse events directly related to the use of OP-1 Putty.
CONCLUSION: Despite the challenges associated with obtaining a solid uninstrumented fusion in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis, the rates of radiographic fusion, clinical improvement, and overall success associated with the use of OP-1 Putty were at least comparable to that of the autograft controls for at least 48 months after surgery. These results appear to validate the short-term results previously reported for OP-1 Putty and suggest that this material may potentially represent a viable bone graft substitute for certain fusion applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17588821     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  37 in total

Review 1.  Growth factor delivery-based tissue engineering: general approaches and a review of recent developments.

Authors:  Kangwon Lee; Eduardo A Silva; David J Mooney
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  2011 AOA Symposium: Tissue Engineering and Tissue Regeneration: AOA critical issues.

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Scott D Boden; Martha M Murray; Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Large volume inside the cage leading incomplete interbody bone fusion and residual back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mikinobu Takeuchi; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Norimitsu Wakao; Atsuhiko Hirasawa; Katsuhisa Kawanami; Koji Osuka; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.

Authors:  Ashim Gupta; Nitin Kukkar; Kevin Sharif; Benjamin J Main; Christine E Albers; Saadiq F El-Amin Iii
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

7.  Use of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

8.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 9.  [Adipose tissue--an endocrine organ].

Authors:  M Blüher
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  Use of autologous bone graft in anterior cervical decompression: morbidity & quality of life analysis.

Authors:  Helen M Heneghan; John P McCabe
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.