Literature DB >> 12531564

Cancellous bone microdamage in the proximal femur: influence of age and osteoarthritis on damage morphology and regional distribution.

N L Fazzalari1, J S Kuliwaba, M R Forwood.   

Abstract

This study describes the in vivo distribution of cancellous bone microdamage in the proximal femur of an autopsy control sample. In addition, in vivo microdamage in the region medial to the greater trochanter of the proximal femur is compared between patients with severe osteoarthritis and controls. Taken at autopsy, the control group comprised normal right proximal femora that were then cut in the coronal plane with an Exakt saw (n = 12; aged 20-83 years). Cancellous bone samples were taken from the subchondral principal compressive region, the medial principal compressive region, and medial to the greater trochanter. A cancellous bone core biopsy was taken of the region medial to the greater trochanter (of the proximal femur) from patients with primary osteoarthritis undergoing total hip replacement surgery (n = 33; aged 37-85 years). Samples were embedded in resin, and in vivo microdamage identified in 70-microm-thick sections using the basic fuchsin en bloc staining technique. Microdamage was similar in all proximal femur sites in controls, except in the subchondral principal compressive region, where a significantly smaller crack length (microm) was identified (p < 0.05). In the region medial to the greater trochanter, osteoarthritic vs. control group comparisons showed that the crack density (#/mm(2)) and crack surface density (mm/mm(2)) were not significantly different, but crack length was significantly less (p < 0.03) and damage volume fraction was significantly increased for osteoarthritics (p < 0.005). The osteoarthritic and control data for crack density, and the osteoarthritic data for damage volume fraction, showed a nonlinear increase with age. Furthermore, crack length was not dependent on damage volume fraction or age for either the osteoarthritic or control group. This study identified differences in microdamage between osteoarthritic and autopsy control cases. We hypothesize that these results are consistent with the reported bone material property differences for osteoarthritis. In addition, the relatively uniform distribution of microdamage in the control group suggests that the principal components of the femoral cancellous bone network are equally exposed to deformations resulting in microdamage. Further study into the factors that influence the accumulation and skeletal distribution of microdamage is fundamental to understanding skeletal health. Copyright 2002 by Elsevier Science Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12531564     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00906-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  19 in total

Review 1.  The past, present, and future of bone morphometry: its contribution to an improved understanding of bone biology.

Authors:  Webster S S Jee
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Daniel B Masse; Huijie Leng; Kevin P Hess; Ryan D Ross; Ryan K Roeder; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Bone microdamage.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Regional variations of bone quantity and quality impact femoral head collapse.

Authors:  Christian J Zaino; Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Age-related changes in human trabecular bone: Relationship between microstructural stress and strain and damage morphology.

Authors:  Jessica O Green; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Tamim Diab; Brani Vidakovic; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Inhibition of mTORC1 in the rat condyle subchondral bone aggravates osteoarthritis induced by the overly forward extension of the mandible.

Authors:  Yazhen Li; Jing Yang; Ying Liu; Xiao Yan; Qi Zhang; Junbo Chen; Qiang Zhang; Xiao Yuan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Structural and mechanical repair of diffuse damage in cortical bone in vivo.

Authors:  Zeynep Seref-Ferlengez; Jelena Basta-Pljakic; Oran D Kennedy; Claudy J Philemon; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Accumulation of microdamage and low bone mass in the femoral head as a cause of subchondral insufficiency fracture in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Ken Iwata; Tasuku Mashiba; Masashi Shimamura; Takanori Miki; Tetsuji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.