Literature DB >> 17587543

Estimating genotyping error rates from Mendelian errors in SNP array genotypes and their impact on inference.

Ian W Saunders1, Jesper Brohede, Garry N Hannan.   

Abstract

A simple method of inferring the genotyping error rate of SNP arrays and similar high-throughput genotyping methods from Mendelian errors is described. Application to genotypes from small families using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 50 k Array indicates an error rate of about 0.1%, and this rate can be reduced by increasing the quality criterion for calls, though at the cost of a reduced genotype call rate, which limits the benefit available. Simulated data are used to show that the number of SNPs on this array is sufficient for such a low error rate to have little impact on identical by descent-based inference for disease linkage in sib-pair studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17587543     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  23 in total

1.  Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Bryce Borchers; Marshall Brown; Brian McLellan; Airat Bekmetjev; Nathan L Tintle
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-05

2.  Integration of SNP genotyping confidence scores in IBD inference.

Authors:  Barak Markus; Ohad S Birk; Dan Geiger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Accuracy and quality assessment of 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing.

Authors:  André Gilles; Emese Meglécz; Nicolas Pech; Stéphanie Ferreira; Thibaut Malausa; Jean-François Martin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Distinct error rates for reference and nonreference genotypes estimated by pedigree analysis.

Authors:  Richard J Wang; Predrag Radivojac; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Marker genotyping error effects on genomic predictions under different genetic architectures.

Authors:  Tahere Akbarpour; Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh; Abdol Ahad Shadparvar
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Evidence of linkage to chromosomes 10p15.3-p15.1, 14q24.3-q31.1 and 9q33.3-q34.3 in non-syndromic colorectal cancer families.

Authors:  Ian W Saunders; Jason Ross; Finlay Macrae; Graeme P Young; Ignacio Blanco; Jesper Brohede; Glenn Brown; Diana Brookes; Trevor Lockett; Peter L Molloy; Victor Moreno; Gabriel Capella; Garry N Hannan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Authors:  Nianjun Liu; Dabao Zhang; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  In vitro vs in silico detected SNPs for the development of a genotyping array: what can we learn from a non-model species?

Authors:  Camille Lepoittevin; Jean-Marc Frigerio; Pauline Garnier-Géré; Franck Salin; María-Teresa Cervera; Barbara Vornam; Luc Harvengt; Christophe Plomion
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.

Authors:  Nathan Tintle; Derek Gordon; Dirk Van Bruggen; Stephen Finch
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Population Genetics of the Invasive Red Fox, Vulpes vulpes, in South-Eastern Australia.

Authors:  Kalynda M-A Watson; Katarina M Mikac; Sibylle G Schwab
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.