Literature DB >> 17586685

The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage.

Farokh Dotiwala1, Julian Haase, Ayelet Arbel-Eden, Kerry Bloom, James E Haber.   

Abstract

A single HO endonuclease-induced double-strand break (DSB) is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint and cause Saccharomyces cells to arrest at G(2)/M for 12-14 h, after which cells adapt to the presence of the DSB and resume cell cycle progression. The checkpoint signal leading to G(2)/M arrest was previously shown to be nuclear-limited. Cells lacking ATR-like Mec1 exhibit no DSB-induced cell cycle delay; however, cells lacking Mec1's downstream protein kinase targets, Rad53 or Chk1, still have substantial G(2)/M delay, as do cells lacking securin, Pds1. This delay is eliminated only in the triple mutant chk1Delta rad53Delta pds1Delta, suggesting that Rad53 and Chk1 control targets other than the stability of securin in enforcing checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest. The G(2)/M arrest in rad53Delta and chk1Delta revealed a unique cytoplasmic phenotype in which there are frequent dynein-dependent excursions of the nucleus through the bud neck, without entering anaphase. Such excursions are infrequent in wild-type arrested cells, but have been observed in cells defective in mitotic exit, including the semidominant cdc5-ad mutation. We suggest that Mec1-dependent checkpoint signaling through Rad53 and Chk1 includes the repression of nuclear movements that are normally associated with the execution of anaphase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586685      PMCID: PMC1896138          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609636104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  55 in total

1.  Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest.

Authors:  A Pellicioli; S E Lee; C Lucca; M Foiani; J E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective.

Authors:  B B Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation.

Authors:  T Tanaka; J Fuchs; J Loidl; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin.

Authors:  Lee Zou; David Cortez; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo.

Authors:  J A Melo; J Cohen; D P Toczyski
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Nuclear migration: cortical anchors for cytoplasmic dynein.

Authors:  K Bloom
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The DNA damage checkpoint signal in budding yeast is nuclear limited.

Authors:  J Demeter; S E Lee; J E Haber; T Stearns
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  T Kondo; T Wakayama; T Naiki; K Matsumoto; K Sugimoto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis.

Authors:  C G Pearson; P S Maddox; E D Salmon; K Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03-19       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  A novel role of the budding yeast separin Esp1 in anaphase spindle elongation: evidence that proper spindle association of Esp1 is regulated by Pds1.

Authors:  S Jensen; M Segal; D J Clarke; S I Reed
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Functions and regulation of the Polo-like kinase Cdc5 in the absence and presence of DNA damage.

Authors:  Vladimir V Botchkarev; James E Haber
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  DNA damage checkpoint triggers autophagy to regulate the initiation of anaphase.

Authors:  Farokh Dotiwala; Vinay V Eapen; Jacob C Harrison; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Vikram Ranade; Satoshi Yoshida; James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  When genome integrity and cell cycle decisions collide: roles of polo kinases in cellular adaptation to DNA damage.

Authors:  Diego Serrano; Damien D'Amours
Journal:  Syst Synth Biol       Date:  2014-07-27

4.  Fumarase: a mitochondrial metabolic enzyme and a cytosolic/nuclear component of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ohad Yogev; Orli Yogev; Esti Singer; Eitan Shaulian; Michal Goldberg; Thomas D Fox; Ophry Pines
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Sgs1 and exo1 redundantly inhibit break-induced replication and de novo telomere addition at broken chromosome ends.

Authors:  John R Lydeard; Zachary Lipkin-Moore; Suvi Jain; Vinay V Eapen; James E Haber
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Function of dynein in budding yeast: mitotic spindle positioning in a polarized cell.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Moore; Melissa D Stuchell-Brereton; John A Cooper
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2009-08

7.  Mad2 prolongs DNA damage checkpoint arrest caused by a double-strand break via a centromere-dependent mechanism.

Authors:  Farokh Dotiwala; Jacob C Harrison; Suvi Jain; Neal Sugawara; James E Haber
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end resection and checkpoint deactivation.

Authors:  Vinay V Eapen; Neal Sugawara; Michael Tsabar; Wei-Hua Wu; James E Haber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Rpb1 sumoylation in response to UV radiation or transcriptional impairment in yeast.

Authors:  Xuefeng Chen; Baojin Ding; Danielle LeJeune; Christine Ruggiero; Shisheng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cdc28/Cdk1 positively and negatively affects genome stability in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jorrit M Enserink; Hans Hombauer; Meng-Er Huang; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.