Literature DB >> 17586129

Further results on the risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism in users of the contraceptive transdermal patch compared to users of oral contraceptives containing norgestimate and 35 microg of ethinyl estradiol.

Susan Jick1, James A Kaye, Lin Li, Hershel Jick.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In 2006, we published a study that indicated that the new transdermal contraceptive patch containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and the progestin norelgestromin did not increase the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to oral contraceptive containing norgestimate and 35 microg of EE.
OBJECTIVE: This report updates information on the risk of nonfatal VTE in women using the contraceptive patch in comparison to women using oral contraceptives containing norgestimate (either monophasic or triphasic) and 35 microg of EE (norgestimate-35) using an additional 17 months of data. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Nested case-control design based on information from PharMetrics, a US-based company that collects and organizes information on claims paid by managed care plans. The study was nested among all women, aged 15 to 44 years, who started either the contraceptive patch or norgestimate-35 after April 1, 2002. Cases were women with current use of one of these two study drugs and a documented diagnosis of VTE in the absence of identifiable clinical risk factors (idiopathic VTE) who were not in the earlier study. Up to four controls were matched to each case by age and calendar time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratios (ORs) comparing the risk of nonfatal VTE in new users of the two contraceptives.
RESULTS: We identified 56 new cases of newly diagnosed, idiopathic VTE in the updated study population. The OR comparing the contraceptive patch to norgestimate-35 was 1.1 (95% CI 0.6-2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: After evaluating an additional 17 months of data, the results indicate that the risk of nonfatal VTE for the contraceptive patch is closely similar to the risk for oral contraceptives containing 35 mug of EE and norgestimate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586129     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  18 in total

Review 1.  Hormonal contraception and migraine: clinical considerations.

Authors:  Stephanie S Faubion; Petra M Casey; Lynne T Shuster
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-10

Review 2.  As the world grows: contraception in the 21st century.

Authors:  R John Aitken; Mark A Baker; Gustavo F Doncel; Martin M Matzuk; Christine K Mauck; Michael J K Harper
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Contraception in women with medical problems.

Authors:  Mandish K Dhanjal
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2008-12-01

Review 4.  Hormonal contraception and thrombotic risk: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Cameron C Trenor; Richard J Chung; Alan D Michelson; Ellis J Neufeld; Catherine M Gordon; Marc R Laufer; S Jean Emans
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Estrogen and thrombosis: controversies and common sense.

Authors:  Thomas G DeLoughery
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Health care providers' knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kira Levy; Rachel Ruskin; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Metabolic effects of contraceptive steroids.

Authors:  Regine Sitruk-Ware; Anita Nath
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  Attitudes toward the vaginal ring and transdermal patch among adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Tina R Raine; Laura B Epstein; Cynthia C Harper; Beth A Brown; Cherrie B Boyer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Effects of switching from oral to transdermal or transvaginal contraception on markers of thrombosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Jensen; Anne E Burke; Kurt T Barnhart; Carrie Tillotson; Marci Messerle-Forbes; Dawn Peters
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10.

Authors:  Ojvind Lidegaard; Lars Hougaard Nielsen; Charlotte Wessel Skovlund; Ellen Løkkegaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.