| Literature DB >> 19926525 |
Sridhar Sunderam1, Bruce Gluckman, Davide Reato, Marom Bikson.
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is emerging as a viable alternative for patients with epilepsy whose seizures are not alleviated by drugs or surgery. Its attractions are temporal and spatial specificity of action, flexibility of waveform parameters and timing, and the perception that its effects are reversible unlike resective surgery. However, despite significant advances in our understanding of mechanisms of neural electrical stimulation, clinical electrotherapy for seizures relies heavily on empirical tuning of parameters and protocols. We highlight concurrent treatment goals with potentially conflicting design constraints that must be resolved when formulating rational strategies for epilepsy electrotherapy, namely, seizure reduction versus cognitive impairment, stimulation efficacy versus tissue safety, and mechanistic insight versus clinical pragmatism. First, treatment markers, objectives, and metrics relevant to electrical stimulation for epilepsy are discussed from a clinical perspective. Then the experimental perspective is presented, with the biophysical mechanisms and modalities of open-loop electrical stimulation, and the potential benefits of closed-loop control for epilepsy. 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19926525 PMCID: PMC2818293 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.10.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsy Behav ISSN: 1525-5050 Impact factor: 2.937