Literature DB >> 17580459

Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.

Ulrike Stephanie Beier1, Ingrid Grunert, Siegfried Kulmer, Herbert Dumfahrt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical success of a hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane impression material for fixed dental restorations under various clinical conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,466 preparations for fixed restorations in maxillary and mandibular anterior and posterior teeth were evaluated. The study contained inlay, onlay, crown, veneer, post, and adhesive-wing preparations and implants for gold, porcelain-fused-to-metal, and ceramic restorations. The preparation finish line relative to the crest of the marginal gingiva, type of restoration, and position of the teeth were recorded. Three categories were established to rate impression quality: perfect impressions, with an absence of any voids or bubbles and perfect reproduction of the preparation finish line, were rated Criteria I; acceptable impressions, with minimal defects (< or = 2 mm) not involving the preparation finish line, were rated Criteria II; and unacceptable impressions, with larger voids or bubbles (> 2 mm) or defects involving the preparation finish line, were rated Criteria III.
RESULTS: Overall, 96.86% of the final impressions were clinically acceptable, 89.43% of which were rated Criteria I and 7.43% of which were rated Criteria II. Only 3.14% of the impressions were unacceptable and rated Criteria III. A significant influence on impression quality was found when the preparation finish line was more than 2 mm subgingival (P < .004), as well as when a beveled preparation was used (P < .004). The position of the teeth (P > .404) had no significant effect.
CONCLUSION: Surface-activated polyvinyl siloxane impression material offers high predictability to avoid bubbles and voids in the final impression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17580459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy of two gingival retraction systems on lateral gingival displacement: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Purwar Anupam; N Namratha; Shetty Vibha; G N Anandakrishna; Khanna Shally; Amit Singh
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-07-03

2.  Clinical success rates for polyether crown impressions when mixed dynamically and statically.

Authors:  Marc Schmitter; Glen H Johnson; Clovis Faggion; Christina Klose; Gergo Mitov; Frank P Nothdurft; Peter R Pospiech; Peter Rammelsberg; Brigitte Ohlmann; Stefanie Schwarz; Thomas Stober; Petra Schiller; Maria Pritsch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Laboratory Technician Assessment of the Quality of Single-Unit Crown Preparations and Impressions as Predictors of the Clinical Acceptability of Crowns as Determined by the Treating Dentist: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Alexandra E S Thomson; Alan Slootsky; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen.

Authors:  Nusaiba M Al-Odinee; Mohsen Al-Hamzi; Ibrahim Z Al-Shami; Ahmed Madfa; Abdulwahab I Al-Kholani; Yazeed M Al-Olofi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.