BACKGROUND: In advanced gastric cancer few data are available on the efficacy or safety of new drug combination regimens after progression following first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) less than 2, progressing after first-line chemotherapy, were eligible. Patients were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 3 weeks, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Between May 2002 and April 2005, 38 patients were enrolled. Men accounted for 73.7% of the patients and the median age was 59 years. The primary tumor was not resected in 47.4% of the patients; the peritoneum was the most frequent metastatic site (60.5%). The first-line treatment was cisplatin, epirubicin, and infusional 5-fluorouracil (ECF) in 81.5% of the patients and cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (CF) in 15.7%. The median number of cycles was 4.3. The treatment was well tolerated, with no toxic deaths. National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade III-IV neutropenia was frequent (26.3%), but no febrile neutropenia was reported. Severe asthenia (15.7%) and severe nausea (15.7%) required dose reductions in 2 patients and treatment discontinuation in another. The overall response rate was 10.5%, and 18 patients (47.3%) experienced disease stabilization (7 of them with significant clinical benefit). Median time to progression was 4.0 months (range, 2-8 months) and median overall survival was 8.1 months (range, 3-26 months). Thirteen patients (34.2%) also received third-line chemotherapy, with an irinotecan-containing regimen, and their median overall survival was higher than that of the other patients (16.3 vs 6.0 months) CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel shows only marginal activity as second-line treatment, but it has a good tolerability profile. This suggests that there is room for optimizing the schedule as well as for planning sequential treatments in gastric cancer.
BACKGROUND: In advanced gastric cancer few data are available on the efficacy or safety of new drug combination regimens after progression following first-line chemotherapy. METHODS:Patients with histologically confirmed advanced gastric cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) less than 2, progressing after first-line chemotherapy, were eligible. Patients were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 3 weeks, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Between May 2002 and April 2005, 38 patients were enrolled. Men accounted for 73.7% of the patients and the median age was 59 years. The primary tumor was not resected in 47.4% of the patients; the peritoneum was the most frequent metastatic site (60.5%). The first-line treatment was cisplatin, epirubicin, and infusional 5-fluorouracil (ECF) in 81.5% of the patients and cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (CF) in 15.7%. The median number of cycles was 4.3. The treatment was well tolerated, with no toxic deaths. National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade III-IV neutropenia was frequent (26.3%), but no febrile neutropenia was reported. Severe asthenia (15.7%) and severe nausea (15.7%) required dose reductions in 2 patients and treatment discontinuation in another. The overall response rate was 10.5%, and 18 patients (47.3%) experienced disease stabilization (7 of them with significant clinical benefit). Median time to progression was 4.0 months (range, 2-8 months) and median overall survival was 8.1 months (range, 3-26 months). Thirteen patients (34.2%) also received third-line chemotherapy, with an irinotecan-containing regimen, and their median overall survival was higher than that of the other patients (16.3 vs 6.0 months) CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel shows only marginal activity as second-line treatment, but it has a good tolerability profile. This suggests that there is room for optimizing the schedule as well as for planning sequential treatments in gastric cancer.
Authors: C Barone; D C Corsi; C Pozzo; A Cassano; T Fontana; M R Noviello; M Landriscina; G Colloca; A Astone Journal: Cancer Date: 1998-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Se Hoon Park; Won Ki Kang; Hyo Rak Lee; Jinny Park; Kyung-Eun Lee; Se Hoon Lee; Joon Oh Park; Kihyun Kim; Won Seog Kim; Chul Won Chung; Young-Hyuk Im; Mark H Lee; Chan H Park; Keunchil Park Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: A D Roth; R Maibach; G Martinelli; N Fazio; M S Aapro; O Pagani; R Morant; M M Borner; R Herrmann; H Honegger; F Cavalli; P Alberto; M Castiglione; A Goldhirsch Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: D Kelsen; O T Atiq; L Saltz; D Niedzwiecki; D Ginn; D Chapman; R Heelan; C Lightdale; V Vinciguerra; M Brennan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: N K Kim; Y S Park; D S Heo; C Suh; S Y Kim; K C Park; Y K Kang; D B Shin; H T Kim; H J Kim Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Juan W Valle; Anne Armstrong; Chris Newman; Valery Alakhov; Grzegorz Pietrzynski; Julie Brewer; Sue Campbell; Pippa Corrie; Eric K Rowinsky; Malcolm Ranson Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 3.850