PURPOSE: In order to define the most effective administration schedule of the combination of paclitaxel and oxaliplatin, we investigated the in vitro interaction between these drugs in a panel of three human cancer cell lines (AZ-521 gastric adenocarcinoma cell line, HST-1 tongue squamous carcinoma cell line, and KSE-1 esophageal squamous carcinoma cell line). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytotoxic activity was determined by the WST-1 assay. Different administration schedules of the two drugs were compared and evaluated for synergism, additivity, or antagonism with a quantitative method based on the median-effect principle of Chou and Talalay. Cell cycle perturbation and apoptosis were evaluated by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Simultaneous treatment of cells with paclitaxel and oxaliplatin showed greater than additive effects. Upon 24-h sequential exposure, the sequence of paclitaxel followed by oxaliplatin showed synergistic effects in AZ-521 and HST-1 cells, and greater than additive effects in KSE-1 cells, while the opposite sequence yielded marked antagonistic effects in all three cell lines. Flow cytometric analysis indicated that paclitaxel induced G(2)/M arrest with subsequent induction of apoptosis in the sub-G(1) phase. Apoptosis was most prominent when paclitaxel preceded oxaliplatin, which produced apoptosis in the majority of treated cells (75%). By contrast, the reverse sequence yielded only 39% induction of apoptotic cells, the rate being not different from those induced by each drug singly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the interaction of paclitaxel and oxaliplatin is highly schedule-dependent and that the sequential administration of paclitaxel followed by oxaliplatin should thus be incorporated into the design of a clinical trial.
PURPOSE: In order to define the most effective administration schedule of the combination of paclitaxel and oxaliplatin, we investigated the in vitro interaction between these drugs in a panel of three humancancer cell lines (AZ-521gastric adenocarcinoma cell line, HST-1 tongue squamous carcinoma cell line, and KSE-1 esophageal squamous carcinoma cell line). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Cytotoxic activity was determined by the WST-1 assay. Different administration schedules of the two drugs were compared and evaluated for synergism, additivity, or antagonism with a quantitative method based on the median-effect principle of Chou and Talalay. Cell cycle perturbation and apoptosis were evaluated by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Simultaneous treatment of cells with paclitaxel and oxaliplatin showed greater than additive effects. Upon 24-h sequential exposure, the sequence of paclitaxel followed by oxaliplatin showed synergistic effects in AZ-521 and HST-1 cells, and greater than additive effects in KSE-1 cells, while the opposite sequence yielded marked antagonistic effects in all three cell lines. Flow cytometric analysis indicated that paclitaxel induced G(2)/M arrest with subsequent induction of apoptosis in the sub-G(1) phase. Apoptosis was most prominent when paclitaxel preceded oxaliplatin, which produced apoptosis in the majority of treated cells (75%). By contrast, the reverse sequence yielded only 39% induction of apoptotic cells, the rate being not different from those induced by each drug singly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the interaction of paclitaxel and oxaliplatin is highly schedule-dependent and that the sequential administration of paclitaxel followed by oxaliplatin should thus be incorporated into the design of a clinical trial.