Literature DB >> 20660681

Comparative effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin among a national cohort of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Aisling R Caffrey1, Brian J Quilliam, Kerry L LaPlante.   

Abstract

While newer antibiotics play a key role in treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, knowledge of their real-world clinical impact is limited. We sought to quantify the effectiveness of linezolid compared to that of vancomycin among MRSA-infected patients. This national retrospective cohort study included adult patients admitted to all Veterans Affairs hospitals between January 2002 and June 2008, infected with MRSA, and treated with either linezolid (oral or intravenous [i.v.]) or vancomycin (i.v.). Patients were followed from their treatment initiation date until the event of interest, discharge, death, or December 2008. Utilizing propensity score methods, we estimated the treatment effects of linezolid primarily on time to discharge and secondarily on time to all-cause in-hospital mortality, therapy discontinuation, and all-cause 90-day readmission with Cox proportional-hazard models. We identified 20,107 patients treated with linezolid (3.2%) or vancomycin (96.8%). Baseline covariates were well balanced by treatment group within propensity score quintiles and between propensity score matched patients (626 pairs). The discharge rate was significantly higher among patients treated with linezolid, representing a decreased length of stay, in both the propensity score adjusted (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.27 to 1.50) and matched (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.00) analyses. A significantly decreased rate of therapy discontinuation, indicating longer therapy duration, was observed in the linezolid group (adjusted HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.75; matched HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.65). In this clinical population of MRSA-infected patients, linezolid therapy was as effective as vancomycin therapy with respect to in-hospital survival and readmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660681      PMCID: PMC2944576          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00200-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  31 in total

1.  FDA evaluation of antimicrobials: subgroup analysis.

Authors:  John H Powers; Daphne Lin; David Ross
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Is linezolid superior to vancomycin for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

Authors:  Andre C Kalil; Susan Puumala; Julie Stoner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Microbiological features of vancomycin in the 21st century: minimum inhibitory concentration creep, bactericidal/static activity, and applied breakpoints to predict clinical outcomes or detect resistant strains.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Linezolid reduces length of stay and duration of intravenous treatment compared with vancomycin for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Kamal M F Itani; John Weigelt; Jim Z Li; Sandeep Duttagupta
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Comparison of length of hospital stay for patients with known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species infections treated with linezolid or vancomycin: a randomized, multicenter trial.

Authors:  Z Li; R J Willke; L A Pinto; B E Rittenhouse; M J Rybak; A M Pleil; C W Crouch; B Hafkin; H A Glick
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.705

6.  Linezolid versus vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of randomized studies.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Mark J Kunkel; Marin Kollef
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Dennis L Stevens; Daniel Herr; Harry Lampiris; John Lee Hunt; Donald H Batts; Barry Hafkin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-05-13       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: treatment failure with linezolid.

Authors:  Maria E Ruiz; Isabel C Guerrero; Carmelita U Tuazon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia.

Authors:  Richard G Wunderink; Jordi Rello; Sue K Cammarata; Rodney V Croos-Dabrera; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Trends in the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in children's hospitals in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Gerber; Susan E Coffin; Sarah A Smathers; Theoklis E Zaoutis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Epidemiology of pneumococcal disease in a national cohort of older adults.

Authors:  Haley J Morrill; Aisling R Caffrey; Eunsun Noh; Kerry L LaPlante
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2014-04-12

2.  Application of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus risk score for community-onset pneumonia patients and outcomes with initial treatment.

Authors:  Besu F Teshome; Grace C Lee; Kelly R Reveles; Russell T Attridge; Jim Koeller; Chen-pin Wang; Eric M Mortensen; Christopher R Frei
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Economic burden of inpatient and outpatient antibiotic treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus complicated skin and soft-tissue infections: a comparison of linezolid, vancomycin, and daptomycin.

Authors:  Jennifer M Stephens; Xin Gao; Dipen A Patel; Bram G Verheggen; Ahmed Shelbaya; Seema Haider
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-09-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.