Literature DB >> 12742958

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients: gold standard for golden years?

Juliane Bingener1, Melanie L Richards, Wayne H Schwesinger, William E Strodel, Kenneth R Sirinek.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has known physiological benefits and positive socioeconomic effects over the open procedure. Although recent studies have questioned the technique's efficacy in elderly patients (>65 years), we hypothesize that LC is safe and efficacious in that patient group.
METHODS: Five thousand eight hundred eighty-four consecutive patients (mean age, 40 years; 26% male) underwent an attempted LC (conversion rate, 5.2%) from 1991 to 2001 at a teaching institution. Of these, 395 patients (6.7%) were older than 65 years. Analysis included patient age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, conversion rate, morbidity, mortality, and assessment of results over time.
RESULTS: Elderly patients were predominantly male (64%). Septuagenarians had a 40% incidence of complicated gallstone disease, such as acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, or biliary pancreatitis, and octogenarians had a 55% incidence. Overall mortality was 1.4%. The conversion rate was 17% for the first 5 years of the study period and 7% for the second half. The conversion rate was 22% for patients with complicated disease and 2.5% for patients with chronic cholecystitis. Average hospital stay decreased from 10.2 days to 4.6 days during the first and second half of the study period, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of LC in patients aged 65 to 69 years are comparable with those previously reported in younger patients. Patients older than 70 years had a 2-fold increase in complicated biliary tract disease and conversion rates, but a low mortality rate (2%) compared with results of other authors (12%), despite an increase in American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. Increased technical experience with LC favorably affected outcomes over time. Early diagnosis and treatment prior to onset of complications are necessary for further improvement in the outcomes of elderly patients undergoing LC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742958     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.5.531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  36 in total

1.  Percutaneous drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Kortram; T S de Vries Reilingh; M J Wiezer; B van Ramshorst; D Boerma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Expectant treatment of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis in patients over 80 years of age.

Authors:  R Costi; L Sarli; V Violi; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Factors associated with prolonged stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  Shih-Ping Cheng; Yuan-Ching Chang; Chien-Liang Liu; Tsen-Long Yang; Kuo-Shyang Jeng; Jie-Jen Lee; Tsang-Pai Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A comparison of effectiveness of two surgical units in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Libert Anil Gomes
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2008-07

8.  Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Anders Winbladh; Per Gullstrand; Joar Svanvik; Per Sandström
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Cholecystectomy in octogenarians: be careful.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Fukami; Yasuhiro Kurumiya; Keisuke Mizuno; Ei Sekoguchi; Satoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2014-09-30

10.  Safety of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients on dialysis: an analysis of the ACS NSQIP database.

Authors:  A Rao; A Polanco; E Chin; C M Divino; S Qiu; S Q Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.