Literature DB >> 17574816

Comparison of fMRI statistical software packages and strategies for analysis of images containing random and stimulus-correlated motion.

Victoria L Morgan1, Benoit M Dawant, Yong Li, David R Pickens.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to use computer-generated phantoms containing real subject motion to: (1) compare the sensitivity of four commonly used fMRI software packages and (2) compare the sensitivity of three statistical analysis strategies with respect to motion correction. The results suggest that all four packages perform similarly in fMRI statistical analysis with SPM2 having slightly higher sensitivity. The most sensitive analysis technique was to perform motion correction and include the realignment parameters as regressors in the general linear model. This approach applies to all four packages examined and can be most beneficial when stimulus-correlated motion is present.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17574816      PMCID: PMC2570159          DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  37 in total

Review 1.  Sources of distortion in functional MRI data.

Authors:  P Jezzard; S Clare
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Comparison of functional MRI image realignment tools using a computer-generated phantom.

Authors:  V L Morgan; D R Pickens; S L Hartmann; R R Price
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  An empirical comparison of SPM preprocessing parameters to the analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Valeria Della-Maggiore; Wilkin Chau; Pedro R Peres-Neto; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  On the origin of respiratory artifacts in BOLD-EPI of the human brain.

Authors:  Christian Windischberger; Herbert Langenberger; Thomas Sycha; Edda M Tschernko; Gabriele Fuchsjäger-Mayerl; Leopold Schmetterer; Ewald Moser
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Experimental designs and processing strategies for fMRI studies involving overt verbal responses.

Authors:  Rasmus M Birn; Robert W Cox; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Wavelet-based Rician noise removal for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R D Nowak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 10.856

10.  Functional MRI statistical software packages: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  S Gold; B Christian; S Arndt; G Zeien; T Cizadlo; D L Johnson; M Flaum; N C Andreasen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  18 in total

1.  Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI. I. Standard temporal motion and physiological noise correction methods.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Anita Oder; Hervé Abdi; Fred Tam; Wayne Lee; Christopher Thomas; Jon E Ween; Simon J Graham; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Progress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Rick O Gilmore; Michele T Diaz; Brad A Wyble; Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  SimPACE: generating simulated motion corrupted BOLD data with synthetic-navigated acquisition for the development and evaluation of SLOMOCO: a new, highly effective slicewise motion correction.

Authors:  Erik B Beall; Mark J Lowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Bootstrap generation and evaluation of an fMRI simulation database.

Authors:  Pierre Bellec; Vincent Perlbarg; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Statistical improvements in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses produced by censoring high-motion data points.

Authors:  Joshua S Siegel; Jonathan D Power; Joseph W Dubis; Alecia C Vogel; Jessica A Church; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Functional connectivity of the hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy: feasibility of a task-regressed seed-based approach.

Authors:  Nuri Erkut Kucukboyaci; Nobuko Kemmotsu; Chris E Cheng; Holly M Girard; Evelyn S Tecoma; Vicente J Iragui; Carrie R McDonald
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013

Review 7.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal.

Authors:  César Caballero-Gaudes; Richard C Reynolds
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  SimTB, a simulation toolbox for fMRI data under a model of spatiotemporal separability.

Authors:  Erik B Erhardt; Elena A Allen; Yonghua Wei; Tom Eichele; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Post-hoc physiological waveform extraction from motion estimation in simultaneous multislice (SMS) functional MRI using separate stack processing.

Authors:  Lia M Hocke; Blaise B Frederick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI: 2. Interactions with ICA, PCA, task contrast and inter-subject heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Grigori Yourganov; Anita Oder; Fred Tam; Simon J Graham; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.