Literature DB >> 18622709

Racial and geographic differences in mammography screening in St. Louis City: a multilevel study.

Min Lian1, Donna B Jeffe, Mario Schootman.   

Abstract

To examine racial differences in mammography use and its determinants in the City of St. Louis, MO, USA, we recruited women age 40 or older using random-digit dialing to (1) examine the difference in mammography use between white women and African American women and (2) identify individual- and census-tract-level risk factors of nonadherence to mammography. During telephone interviews, we inquired about mammography use and several demographic, psychosocial, and health behavior variables. We determined the residential census tracts of study subjects using a geographic information system. The rate of mammography use was 68.0% among white women and 74.7% among African American women (P = 0.022). African American women were more likely to have mammograms than white woman (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.69). System-level barriers to mammography and heavy smoking were associated with lower mammography use among both white and African American women. Personal-experience barriers to mammography and no physician recommendation also were independently associated with mammography use among white women. White women residing within a historic geographic cluster area of late-stage breast cancer were less likely to have mammograms (adjusted OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.22-0.80), while African American women residing within a historic geographic cluster area of late-stage breast cancer were equally likely to have mammograms (adjusted OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.28-2.24). Neither individual- nor census-tract-level socioeconomic status was associated with mammography screening. These findings suggest that there may be a greater need for increasing mammography use among white women, especially in the historic cluster area of late-stage breast cancer in St. Louis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18622709      PMCID: PMC2527433          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-008-9301-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  45 in total

Review 1.  Equitable access to cancer services: A review of barriers to quality care.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; K R Yabroff; J F Kerner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening.

Authors:  J C Hyndman; C D Holman; V P Dawes
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; D K Wagener; M L Brown; W W Davis; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Use of a geographic information system to identify and characterize areas with high proportions of distant stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa M Roche; Ric Skinner; Rachel B Weinstein
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2002-03

5.  Difficulty in reaching low-income women for screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Hardy; N U Ahmed; M K Hargreaves; K A Semenya; L Wu; Y Belay; A J Cebrun
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2000-02

6.  Are rural residents less likely to obtain recommended preventive healthcare services?

Authors:  M M Casey; K Thiede Call; J M Klingner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; E P McCarthy; R B Davis; H Siebens
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997)--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  D K Blackman; E M Bennett; D S Miller
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1999-10-08

9.  A systems model of clinical preventive care: the case of breast cancer screening among older women. For the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  D S Lane; J Zapka; N Breen; C R Messina; D J Fotheringham
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Patient and provider priorities for cancer prevention and control: a qualitative study in Mid-Atlantic Latinos.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Regina Rentería-Weitzman; Elmer E Huerta; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.847

View more
  13 in total

1.  Understanding narrative effects: the role of discrete negative emotions on message processing and attitudes among low-income African American women.

Authors:  Jina H Yoo; Matthew W Kreuter; Choi Lai; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-10-10

2.  Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a Breast Health Center Outreach Program.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Susan Kraenzle; Bettina F Drake; Masayoshi Oka; Melody S Goodman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Medical barriers to mammography screening of African American women in a high cancer mortality area: implications for cancer educators and health providers.

Authors:  Rosalie F Young; Kendra Schwartz; Jason Booza
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Prevalence and correlates of recent and repeat mammography among California women ages 55-79.

Authors:  William Rakowski; Roberta Wyn; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Utilization of screening mammography among middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Matthew Lee Smith; Angela K Hochhalter; SangNam Ahn; Meghan M Wernicke; Marcia G Ory
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Understanding narrative effects: the impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter; Bindu Kalesan; Kassandra I Alcaraz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Differences in Breast Cancer Screening Practices by Diabetes Status and Race/Ethnicity in the United States.

Authors:  Sydney E Kim; Alexandra E Bachorik; Kimberly A Bertrand; Christine M Gunn
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.017

8.  Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care.

Authors:  Jim P Stimpson; José A Pagán; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Min Lian; Mario Schootman; Shumei Yun
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Improving breast cancer services for African-American women living in St. Louis.

Authors:  Lailea Noel; Shahnjayla K Connors; Melody S Goodman; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.