Literature DB >> 17571254

Neoimmun versus Neoral: a bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers and influence of a fat-rich meal on the bioavailability of Neoimmun.

F Kees1, M Bucher, F Schweda, H Gschaidmeier, L Faerber, R Seifert.   

Abstract

In two crossover studies with 12 (6 males/6 females) healthy young volunteers each, we compared the bioavailability of Neoimmun capsules with the microemulsion Neoral and the influence of a fat-rich breakfast on the bioavailability of Neoimmun. Each volunteer received a single dose of 200 mg cyclosporine A in each period. Blood samples were taken up to 24 h and analysed for cyclosporine A by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and photometric detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental analysis. The treatments were tested for bioequivalence and significant differences. The bioavailability of Neoimmun was significantly lower compared to Neoral, albeit Neoimmun met the bioequivalence criterion (90% confidence interval of AUC 0.80-0.94) or missed the criterion only marginally (90% confidence interval of c (max) 0.75-0.91). The bioavailability of Neoimmun as determined by area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by nearly 20% after a fat-rich breakfast. However, mean peak concentrations after food were only higher in male subjects, whereas mean peak concentrations in female subjects were lower compared to fasting administration. In conclusion, our data show that Neoimmun exhibits a lower bioavailability than the microemulsion Neoral and that food has a significant but variable and sex-dependent impact on the bioavailability of Neoimmun capsules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17571254     DOI: 10.1007/s00210-007-0169-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.195


  28 in total

1.  Equoral, new cyclosporine drug delivery system, versus neoral: a bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T Andrysek; M Masri; A Jegorov; Z Veselsky; V Matha
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic considerations in obesity.

Authors:  R A Blouin; G W Warren
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 3.  Recommendations for bioequivalence testing of cyclosporine generics revisited.

Authors:  U Christians; M R First; L Z Benet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Comparative bioavailability of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) with a generic dispersion formulation (Cicloral) in young healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Frieder Kees; Michael Bucher; Frank Schweda; Harald Gschaidmeier; Juergen Burhenne; Gerd Mikus; Lothar Faerber
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 5.  Is C2 monitoring or another limited sampling strategy superior to C0 monitoring in improving clinical outcomes in adult liver transplant recipients?

Authors:  Judith Geneviève Marin; Marc Levine; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Cicloral versus neoral: a bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers on the influence of a fat-rich meal on the bioavailability of cicloral.

Authors:  F Kees; G Mair; M Dittmar; M Bucher
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 7.  Potential clinical implications of substitution of generic cyclosporine formulations for cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) in transplant recipients.

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; Philip Belitsky; Ulrich Frei; John Horvath; Peter Hoyer; J Harold Helderman; Michael Oellerich; Stephen Pollard; Hany Riad; Paolo Rigotti; Paul Keown; Björn Nashan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Bioequivalence and other unresolved issues in generic drug substitution.

Authors:  Peter Meredith
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Monitoring cyclosporin in blood: between-assay differences at trough and 2 hours post-dose (C2).

Authors:  Atholl Johnston; Gary Chusney; Ekkehard Schütz; Michael Oellerich; Terry D Lee; David W Holt
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Sex-associated differences in organ transplantation: different effects of steroid hormones, testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, and prednisolone on the survival time of allogeneic skin graft in rats treated with cyclosporin A.

Authors:  K Hirasawa; S Enosawa
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.066

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Formulations for children: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Hannah K Batchelor; John F Marriott
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Sex differences in drug disposition.

Authors:  Offie P Soldin; Sarah H Chung; Donald R Mattison
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-02-23

3.  Randomized, open-label, comparative phase IV study on the bioavailability of Ciclosporin Pro (Teva) versus Sandimmun® Optoral (Novartis) under fasting versus fed conditions in patients with stable renal transplants.

Authors:  Anja Gäckler; Sebastian Dolff; Hana Rohn; Johannes Korth; Benjamin Wilde; Ute Eisenberger; Anna Mitchell; Andreas Kribben; Oliver Witzke
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 4.  The Role of Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Aging and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Carmine Izzo; Paolo Vitillo; Paola Di Pietro; Valeria Visco; Andrea Strianese; Nicola Virtuoso; Michele Ciccarelli; Gennaro Galasso; Albino Carrizzo; Carmine Vecchione
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15

5.  Bioequivalence and tolerability assessment of a novel intravenous ciclosporin lipid emulsion compared to branded ciclosporin in Cremophor ® EL.

Authors:  Karl Henrik Johannes Ehinger; Magnus Joakim Hansson; Fredrik Sjövall; Eskil Elmér
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.