Literature DB >> 12657910

Monitoring cyclosporin in blood: between-assay differences at trough and 2 hours post-dose (C2).

Atholl Johnston1, Gary Chusney, Ekkehard Schütz, Michael Oellerich, Terry D Lee, David W Holt.   

Abstract

With the introduction of a cyclosporin monitoring strategy based on the use of a sample collected 2 hours after dosing (C2) rather than the predose sample (C0), there was concern that the differences in blood cyclosporin results from the various assay systems would result in assay-specific target ranges for C2 monitoring. In addition, it was not known if the different proportion of cyclosporin metabolites in the blood 2 hours after dosing compared with that seen in predose samples would alter the relationship between the various assay methodologies. The aim of this study was to address these issues using blood samples from patients who had undergone kidney and liver transplantation. To do this, paired samples were collected predose and 2 hours after cyclosporin dosing at various periods following transplantation in kidney (88 paired samples) and liver (165 paired samples) transplant recipients. Cyclosporin was measured in these samples using five different immunoassays (radioimmunoassay, two fluorescent polarization immunoassays, and two homogeneous immunoassays) and high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results of the study showed that when using these immunoassays to measure blood cyclosporin concentrations at C0, the cross-reactivity of the antibodies in the different immunoassay kits resulted in target therapeutic ranges that would need to vary between assays to maintain parity. However, when the same assays were used to measure the blood cyclosporin concentration at C2, the results were congruent, and assay-specific target therapeutic ranges should not be necessary. Thus, when adopting a C2 monitoring strategy, it is possible to use target therapeutic ranges that are independent of the assay system used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12657910     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200304000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  4 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in de novo Chinese adult renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Zheng Jiao; Xiao-jin Shi; Zhong-dong Li; Ming-kang Zhong
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Patient characteristics influencing ciclosporin pharmacokinetics and accurate Bayesian estimation of ciclosporin exposure in heart, lung and kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Franck Saint-Marcoux; Pierre Marquet; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain; Nicole Bernard; Philippe Thiry; Yann Le Meur; Annick Rousseau
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  A rapid HPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in human blood samples.

Authors:  Christoph Seger; Karin Tentschert; Wolfgang Stöggl; Andrea Griesmacher; Steven L Ramsay
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Neoimmun versus Neoral: a bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers and influence of a fat-rich meal on the bioavailability of Neoimmun.

Authors:  F Kees; M Bucher; F Schweda; H Gschaidmeier; L Faerber; R Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.195

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.