Henry C Lukaski1, Clinton B Hall, William A Siders. 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. Henry.Lukaski@ARS.USDA.GOV
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that bioelectrical impedance vectors, group and individual, are valid indicators of total body water (TBW) and hydration status in women experiencing fluid gain and loss during and after pregnancy. METHODS: We measured TBW, assessed with D(2)O dilution, and resistance (R) and reactance (Xc), determined with 800 microA at 50 kHz and standardized for height (H) and plotted on a bivariate (R-Xc) graph, in 15 women, 21-37 y of age, longitudinally before and during pregnancy and postpartum (PP). RESULTS: Body weight (61.9 +/- 2.3 to 75.5 +/- 2.3 kg) and TBW (31.4 +/- 1.1 to 38.2 +/- 1.1 L) increased (P < 0.05) from before pregnancy to the third trimester of pregnancy and decreased PP (67.0 +/- 2.3 kg and 32.7 +/- 1.1 L, P < 0.05). R/H and Xc/H decreased during pregnancy (P < 0.05, 361 +/- 10 to 318 +/- 10 and 44 +/- 1 to 36 +/- 1 omega/m, respectively) and increased PP (P < 0.05, 355 +/- 10 and 41 +/- 1 Omega/m). Vector length decreased (P < 0.05, 363 +/- 10 to 320 +/- 10 Omega) during pregnancy and increased PP (P < 0.05, 357 +/- 10 Omega). Changes in vector length and TBW during pregnancy and PP were correlated (r = -0.599, P < 0.001). Women with vectors exceeding a 75% tolerance interval had greater TBW gain (10-12 versus 5-6 L) during pregnancy compared with other women with vectors within this tolerance level. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that impedance vectors provide quantitative evidence of hydration status during pregnancy and that the impedance vector method is useful in monitoring hydration status in pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that bioelectrical impedance vectors, group and individual, are valid indicators of total body water (TBW) and hydration status in women experiencing fluid gain and loss during and after pregnancy. METHODS: We measured TBW, assessed with D(2)O dilution, and resistance (R) and reactance (Xc), determined with 800 microA at 50 kHz and standardized for height (H) and plotted on a bivariate (R-Xc) graph, in 15 women, 21-37 y of age, longitudinally before and during pregnancy and postpartum (PP). RESULTS: Body weight (61.9 +/- 2.3 to 75.5 +/- 2.3 kg) and TBW (31.4 +/- 1.1 to 38.2 +/- 1.1 L) increased (P < 0.05) from before pregnancy to the third trimester of pregnancy and decreased PP (67.0 +/- 2.3 kg and 32.7 +/- 1.1 L, P < 0.05). R/H and Xc/H decreased during pregnancy (P < 0.05, 361 +/- 10 to 318 +/- 10 and 44 +/- 1 to 36 +/- 1 omega/m, respectively) and increased PP (P < 0.05, 355 +/- 10 and 41 +/- 1 Omega/m). Vector length decreased (P < 0.05, 363 +/- 10 to 320 +/- 10 Omega) during pregnancy and increased PP (P < 0.05, 357 +/- 10 Omega). Changes in vector length and TBW during pregnancy and PP were correlated (r = -0.599, P < 0.001). Women with vectors exceeding a 75% tolerance interval had greater TBW gain (10-12 versus 5-6 L) during pregnancy compared with other women with vectors within this tolerance level. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that impedance vectors provide quantitative evidence of hydration status during pregnancy and that the impedance vector method is useful in monitoring hydration status in pregnancy.
Authors: André Dallmann; Ibrahim Ince; Michaela Meyer; Stefan Willmann; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Alison D Gernand; Parul Christian; Kerry J Schulze; Saijuddin Shaikh; Alain B Labrique; Abu Ahmed Shamim; Keith P West Journal: J Nutr Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Camille R Schneider-Worthington; Jessica S Bahorski; David A Fields; Barbara A Gower; José R Fernández; Paula C Chandler-Laney Journal: J Hum Lact Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 2.219
Authors: Saijuddin Shaikh; Kerry J Schulze; Hasmot Ali; Alain B Labrique; Abu Ahmed Shamim; Mahbubur Rashid; Sucheta Mehra; Parul Christian; Keith P West Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Asher Y Rosinger; Hilary J Bethancourt; Abigail M Pauley; Celine Latona; Jason John; Alysha Kelyman; Krista S Leonard; Emily E Hohman; Katherine McNitt; Alison D Gernand; Danielle Symons Downs; Jennifer S Savage Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2021-07-03 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Ashraful I Khan; Sophie Hawkesworth; Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader; Shams El Arifeen; Sophie Moore; Andrew P Hills; Jonathan C Wells; Lars-Åke Persson; Iqbal Kabir Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.000