| Literature DB >> 23082630 |
Ashraful I Khan1, Sophie Hawkesworth, Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader, Shams El Arifeen, Sophie Moore, Andrew P Hills, Jonathan C Wells, Lars-Åke Persson, Iqbal Kabir.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of the Tanita TBF 300A leg-to-leg bioimpedance analyzer for estimating fat-free mass (FFM) in Bangladeshi children aged 4-10 years and to develop novel prediction equations for use in this population, using deuterium dilution as the reference method. Two hundred Bangladeshi children were enrolled. The isotope dilution technique with deuterium oxide was used for estimation of total body water (TBW). FFM estimated by Tanita was compared with results of deuterium oxide dilution technique. Novel prediction equations were created for estimating FFM, using linear regression models, fitting child's height and impedance as predictors. There was a significant difference in FFM and percentage of body fat (BF%) between methods (p<0.01), Tanita underestimating TBW in boys (p=0.001) and underestimating BF% in girls (p<0.001). A basic linear regression model with height and impedance explained 83% of the variance in FFM estimated by deuterium oxide dilution technique. The best-fit equation to predict FFM from linear regression modelling was achieved by adding weight, sex, and age to the basic model, bringing the adjusted R² to 89% (standard error=0.90, p<0.001). These data suggest Tanita analyzer may be a valid field-assessment technique in Bangladeshi children when using population-specific prediction equations, such as the ones developed here.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23082630 PMCID: PMC3489944 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v30i3.12291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Characteristics of subjects
| Age (years) | No. | Weight (kg) | Height (cm) | BMI (kg/m2) | MUAC (cm) | Head circumference (cm) | Impedance (Ohm) | Imped-ance Index | Skinfolds (39) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biceps | Triceps | Sub-scapular | Supra-iliac | |||||||||
| Male: | ||||||||||||
| All | 102 | 16.83±2.9a | 111.43±9.6 | 13.49±0.9a | 15.59±1.2 | 49.34±1.4b | 717.2b | 17.6a | 3.99±0.9 | 6.39±1.4a | 4.49±0.8b | 4.33±1.2 |
| 4.00 to 4.99 | 11 | 13.81±1.3 | 98.28±3.4 | 14.27±0.7 | 15.45±0.9 | 48.75±1.5 | 707.1 | 13.7 | 5.10±0.8 | 7.35±1.3 | 5.13±0.9 | 5.53±1.9 |
| 5.00 to 5.99 | 47 | 15.66±2.4 | 107.32±6.3 | 13.53±1.1 | 15.45±1.3 | 49.00±1.4 | 722.1 | 16.2 | 4.16±0.7 | 6.71±1.3 | 4.53±0.7 | 4.36±1.2 |
| 6.00 to 6.99 | 8 | 17.03±1.9 | 112.41±5.7 | 13.45±0.8 | 15.50±0.9 | 49.76±1.3 | 697.0 | 18.3 | 3.73±0.5 | 5.72±1.2 | 4.22±0.7 | 3.78±1.0 |
| 7.00 to 7.99 | 14 | 18.01±1.5 | 116.37±4.6 | 13.30±0.8 | 15.76±0.9 | 49.89±0.9 | 715.1 | 19.0 | 3.81±0.8 | 6.20±1.38 | 4.54±0.9 | 4.21±1.1 |
| 8.00 to 8.99 | 12 | 19.17±2.1 | 121.00±5.9 | 13.06±0.7 | 15.52±0.7 | 49.81±1.5 | 720.0 | 20.6 | 3.48±0.5 | 5.40±0.95 | 4.08±0.5 | 4.08±0.8 |
| 9.00 to 10.00 | 10 | 21.11±2.6 | 125.99±4.5 | 13.27±1.2 | 16.32±1.5 | 49.86±1.4 | 721.1 | 22.2 | 3.09±0.6 | 5.81±1.74 | 4.22±0.7 | 3.81±0.8 |
| P-valuesc | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 0.429 | 0.055 | 0.925 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.018 | 0.010 | |
| Female: | ||||||||||||
| All | 98 | 15.93±3.3 | 109.51±9.8 | 13.16±0.8 | 15.51±1.3 | 47.97±1.8 | 767.5 | 15.9 | 4.21±0.8 | 6.91±1.5 | 5.02±0.9 | 4.66±1.3 |
| 4.00 to 4.99 | 13 | 13.28±1.1 | 99.25±1.8 | 13.47±0.9 | 15.09±1.1 | 46.69±2.9 | 770.9 | 12.8 | 4.62±1.2 | 7.89±1.5 | 5.57±1.1 | 5.45±1.9 |
| 5.00 to 5.99 | 42 | 14.26±1.9 | 104.73±5.9 | 12.94±0.7 | 15.06±1.1 | 47.80±1.5 | 782.2 | 14.2 | 4.29±0.7 | 6.84±1.2 | 4.97±0.9 | 4.51±0.9 |
| 6.00 to 6.99 | 13 | 15.63±1.2 | 109.38±2.6 | 13.06±0.8 | 15.25±0.9 | 47.57±0.8 | 741.4 | 16.5 | 4.01±0.7 | 6.49±1.2 | 4.77±0.9 | 4.34±0.8 |
| 7.00 to 7.99 | 8 | 16.93±1.9 | 114.46±4.9 | 12.93±1.4 | 15.45±1.5 | 48.58±0.9 | 812.3 | 16.4 | 3.93±0.7 | 6.44±1.5 | 4.45±0.9 | 4.18±0.9 |
| 8.00 to 8.99 | 11 | 20.07±2.6 | 122.29±6.9 | 13.39±0.9 | 16.73±1.3 | 49.41±1.8 | 760.3 | 19.8 | 4.25±0.7 | 7.07±1.9 | 4.92±1.0 | 4.68±1.1 |
| 9.00 to 10.00 | 11 | 20.96±2.5 | 123.65±6.9 | 13.68±0.7 | 16.85±0.7 | 48.73±1.1 | 712.8 | 21.7 | 3.78±0.7 | 6.67±1.7 | 5.35±1.1 | 5.01±1.8 |
| P-valuesc | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.061 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.023 | <0.001 | 0.108 | 0.132 | 0.113 | 0.127 | |
BMI=body mass index;
MUAC=mid-upper arm-circumference;
Reported values are means±SD;
aMeans are significantly different from girls at p<0.05;
bMeans are significantly different from girls at p<0.001;
cOne-way ANOVA for differences across age-groups;
ANOVA=Analysis of variance
Comparison between deuterium oxide dilution technique and Tanita system in measuring body composition in a subsample (n=66)a of subjects aged 7 to 10 years
| Body composition | Deuterium oxide dilution | Tanita system | Mean difference (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall (n=66) | ||||
| TBW (L) | 13.10±1.99 | 12.89±1.78 | 0.22 (-0.09, 0.52) | 0.158 |
| FFM (kg) | 17.04±2.65 | 17.59±2.43 | -0.56 (-0.98, −0.14) | 0.009 |
| FM (kg) | 2.36±1.65 | 1.89±1.10 | 0.47 (-0.02, 0.95) | 0.060 |
| BF% | 13.09±6.06 | 9.10±3.14 | 3.99 (2.31, 5.67) | <0.001 |
| Boys (n=36) | ||||
| TBW (L) | 13.29±1.91 | 12.67±1.60 | 0.62 (0.28, 0.97) | 0.001 |
| FFM (kg) | 17.35±2.53 | 17.30±2.18 | 0.05 (-0.41, 0.51) | 0.827 |
| FM (kg) | 1.91±1.48 | 1.94±.56 | -0.03 (-0.49, 0.42) | 0.883 |
| BF% | 10.76±5.23 | 10.16±2.58 | 0.60 (-1.15, 2.34) | 0.490 |
| Girls (n=30) | ||||
| TBW (L) | 12.88±2.11 | 13.15±1.97 | -0.27 (-0.76, 0.23) | 0.278 |
| FFM (kg) | 16.66±2.78 | 17.96±2.69 | -1.30 (-1.95, −0.64) | <0.001 |
| FM (kg) | 2.90±1.71 | 1.83±1.53 | 1.06 (0.16, 1.97) | 0.023 |
| BF% | 15.89±5.87 | 7.81±3.31 | 8.08 (5.73, 10.44) | <0.001 |
BF%=body fat percentage;
CI=confidence interval;
FFM=Fat-free mass;
FM=fat mass; TBW=Total body water p values refer to paired t-tests;
Values are mean±SD;
aComparison conducted on a subsample of individuals because the Tanita system equations include children aged 7 years and above
Fig. 1.Bland-Altman plot showing agreement in the measurement of FFM between the Tanita system and the deuterium oxide dilution method in a subsample (n=66) of subjects aged 7 to 10 year
Fig. 2.Plot of FFM (kg) from deuterium oxide dilution methods (y-axis) against impedance index (height2/Impedance, x-axis) for the prediction of FFM equation
Prediction equations for FFM in rural Bangladeshi children produced by linear regression modelling
| Model | Adjusted R2 | Standard error | C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic model | FFM=3.21+0.66 (height2/impedance) | 0.83 | 1.137 | 26.64 |
| +Weight | FFM=1.40+0.53 (weight)+0.25 (height2/impedance) | 0.88 | 0.943 | 4.45 |
| +Sex and age | FFM=2.34+0.50 (weight)–0.52 (sex)+0.18 (age)+0.21 (height2/impedance) | 0.89 | 0.902 | 3.51 |
FFM=fat-free mass
*To develop prediction equations for estimating FFM, the FFM from the deuterium oxide dilution and impedance values from the Tanita system were used. The equations were generated by linear regression analysis with fitted impedance index (height2/impedance) as the primary predictor, and weight, age, and sex measurements as further predictors