Literature DB >> 17570275

A stepwise approach to revision total knee arthroplasty.

Douglas A Dennis1.   

Abstract

Successful revision total knee arthroplasty requires detailed preoperative planning and then a meticulous, stepwise execution of the predetermined plan. Critical factors in revision total knee arthroplasty include the choice of skin incision, type of surgical approach, and component removal without removal of substantial additional bone. The surgeon must then assess the degree of bone loss and ligamentous stability and the position of the current joint line, and then determine the type of bone graft, prosthetic components, and fixation methods required to correct the intraoperative deficiencies. Accurate restoration of flexion-extension gap balance is imperative to ensure long-term successful results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17570275     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

1.  The intercondylar notch ceiling: an accurate reference for distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty for severely degenerated varus knees.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Jun Wang; You Wang; Mengning Yan; Jun Zhang; Yiming Zeng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Matthew S Austin
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  The adductor tubercle: an important landmark to determine the joint line level in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Giuseppe Filardo; Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Ibrahim Akkawi; Maria Pia Neri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The accuracy and reliability of pre-operative templating in revision total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of analogue and digital methods.

Authors:  Neil Prakash Morgan Jain; Paul Michael Guyver; Michael James Hayden McCarthy; James Press; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-17

Review 5.  The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis.

Authors:  S Hofmann; G Seitlinger; O Djahani; M Pietsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Causes of a painful total knee arthroplasty. Are patients still receiving total knee arthroplasty for extrinsic pathologies?

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Hamoun Rozati; Mathew D Sewell; Alex L Dodds; Peter Brooks; Minhal Chatoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Management of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Use of a Stepped, Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeve.

Authors:  Marc R Angerame; Jason M Jennings; David C Holst; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-04-24

8.  Causes of Aseptic Persistent Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hong-An Lim; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon; Kyung-Soon Park; Young-Joo Shin; Hong-Yeol Yang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

9.  Comprehensive Operative Note Templates for Primary and Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali J Electricwala; Derek F Amanatullah; Rapeepat I Narkbunnam; James I Huddleston; William J Maloney; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-12-21

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of tibial bone adaptation after revision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of different implant systems.

Authors:  María Paz Quilez; Belen Seral; María Angeles Pérez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.