Literature DB >> 7570719

Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.

M Eliasziw1, R N Rankin, A J Fox, R B Haynes, H J Barnett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The accuracy of routine ultrasonography in detecting severe carotid artery stenosis was evaluated in comparison with cerebral angiography. The precision of ultrasonographic criteria in predicting the risk of stroke was also assessed.
METHODS: A total of 1011 symptomatic carotid bifurcations were studied in patients from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). Given that all patients were considered for entry into the trial, the chance of a verification bias affecting the analyses was minimized. The ultrasonographic data consisted of peak systolic velocities and frequency changes from both the internal and common carotid arteries. Angiographic stenosis was calculated as in NASCET. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed from the ultrasonographic data for the detection of 70% or greater stenosis on the basis of an angiographic assessment. Kaplan-Meier stroke-free survival curves were used to predict the risk of stroke.
RESULTS: The areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.74 to 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 0.79). The sensitivities and specificities ranged from 0.65 to 0.71. The risk of stroke at 18 months declined sharply as the degree of angiographically defined stenosis declined from 99% to 70%. No pattern of decline was apparent on the basis of the ultrasonographic data.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the accuracy of ultrasonography is moderate when flow parameters are used to assess the degree of stenosis. Ultrasonography should be used as a screening tool to exclude patients with no carotid artery disease from further testing. Conventional angiography remains an essential investigation before assigning the risk of stroke and deciding appropriate treatment for extracranial carotid artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7570719     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.10.1747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  25 in total

1.  Is carotid endarterectomy beneficial for patients with stenosis?

Authors:  S Patel; M F Evans
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography.

Authors:  M Koga; K Kimura; K Minematsu; T Yamaguchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Significance of sonographic tissue and surface characteristics of carotid plaques.

Authors:  T J Tegos; K J Kalomiris; M M Sabetai; E Kalodiki; A N Nicolaides
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Ingitha Borisch; Markus Horn; Bernhard Butz; Niels Zorger; Bogdan Draganski; Thilo Hoelscher; Ulrich Bogdahn; Johann Link
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Cerebrovascular disease: Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting-long live the king?

Authors:  Sandra Narayanan; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Changing patterns of abnormal vascular wall F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on follow-up PET/CT studies.

Authors:  Simona Ben-Haim; Ela Kupzov; Ada Tamir; Alex Frenkel; Ora Israel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  CT and ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row CT angiography.

Authors:  L Saba; G Caddeo; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Cerebral lesions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in relation to asymptomatic carotid and vertebral artery stenosis.

Authors:  Sebastian Wiberg; Mikkel Schoos; Henrik Sillesen; Carsten Thomsen; Christian Hassager; Daniel Steinbrüchel; Torben Schroeder; Peter Clemmensen; Henning Kelbæk
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2015-03-09

9.  Carotid stenosis assessment with multi-detector CT angiography: comparison between manual and automatic segmentation methods.

Authors:  Chengcheng Zhu; Andrew J Patterson; Owen M Thomas; Umar Sadat; Martin J Graves; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Emerging role of FDG-PET/CT in assessing atherosclerosis in large arteries.

Authors:  Wengen Chen; Gonca G Bural; Drew A Torigian; Daniel J Rader; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.